Barry v. SeaSpine Holdings Corp. et al
Plaintiff: Dr. Mark A. Barry
Defendant: SeaSpine Orthopedics Corp., SeaSpine Holdings Corp. and SeaSpine, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2021cv00806
Filed: June 2, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Delaware
Presiding Judge: Richard G Andrews
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 1
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 23, 2021 Opinion or Order SO ORDERED, re #8 STIPULATION and Proposed Order to Extend Time (*Reset Answer Deadlines: SeaSpine Holdings Corp. answer due 8/23/2021; SeaSpine Orthopedics Corp. answer due 8/23/2021; SeaSpine, Inc. answer due 8/23/2021). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 6/23/2021. (nms)
June 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendants to answer, move or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint for Patent Infringement to August 23, 2021 - filed by SeaSpine Holdings Corp., SeaSpine Orthopedics Corp., SeaSpine, Inc.. (Egan, Brian)
June 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Pro Hac Vice Attorney David Clay Holloway for Mark A. Barry added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. Associated Cases: 1:21-cv-00805-RGA, 1:21-cv-00806-RGA (myr)
June 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Pro Hac Vice Attorney Dario A. Machleidt for Mark A. Barry added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. Associated Cases: 1:21-cv-00805-RGA, 1:21-cv-00806-RGA(mal)
June 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney D. Clay Holloway, Mitchell G. Stockwell, Dario A. Machleidt, Kathleen R. Geyer, Taylor J. Pfingst, Andrew W. Rinehart, and Courtney S. Dabbiere of Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP - filed by Mark A. Barry. (Gattuso, Dominick)
June 14, 2021 Opinion or Order SO ORDERED, re #7 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney D. Clay Holloway, Mitchell G. Stockwell, Dario A. Machleidt, Kathleen R. Geyer, Taylor J. Pfingst, Andrew W. Rinehart, and Courtney S. Dabbiere of Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP, filed by Mark A. Barry. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 6/14/2021. (nms)
June 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Pro Hac Vice Attorney Andrew W. Rinehart for Mark A. Barry added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. Associated Cases: 1:21-cv-00805-RGA, 1:21-cv-00806-RGA(mal)
June 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Case Assigned to Judge Richard G. Andrews. Please include the initials of the Judge (RGA) after the case number on all documents filed. Associated Cases: 1:21-cv-00805-RGA, 1:21-cv-00806-RGA (rjb)
June 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Mark A. Barry. SeaSpine, Inc. served on 6/2/2021, answer due 6/23/2021. (Gattuso, Dominick)
June 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Mark A. Barry. SeaSpine Holdings Corp. served on 6/2/2021, answer due 6/23/2021. (Gattuso, Dominick)
June 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Mark A. Barry. SeaSpine Orthopedics Corp. served on 6/2/2021, answer due 6/23/2021. (Gattuso, Dominick)
June 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 7,670,358; 8,361,121; 9,339,301; 9,668,787; 9,668,788. (amf)
June 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (amf)
June 2, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT - filed with Jury Demand against SeaSpine Holdings Corp., SeaSpine Orthopedics Corp., SeaSpine, Inc. - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ADEDC-3627575.) - filed by Mark A. Barry. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A-F, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(amf)
June 2, 2021 Opinion or Order No Summons Issued. (amf)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Barry v. SeaSpine Holdings Corp. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dr. Mark A. Barry
Represented By: Dominick T. Gattuso
Represented By: Andrew W. Rinehart
Represented By: Dario A. Machleidt
Represented By: David Clay Holloway
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SeaSpine Orthopedics Corp.
Represented By: Brian P. Egan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SeaSpine Holdings Corp.
Represented By: Brian P. Egan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SeaSpine, Inc.
Represented By: Brian P. Egan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?