New York University v. ResMed Inc.
| New York University |
| ResMed Inc. |
| 1:2021cv00813 |
| June 2, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Colm F Connolly |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
SO ORDERED, re #8 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for defendant to respond to the Complaint to August 27, 2021 filed by ResMed Inc., Set/Reset Answer Deadlines: ResMed Inc. answer due 8/27/2021. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 7/21/2021. (fms)
|
| Filing 8 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for defendant to respond to the Complaint to August 27, 2021 - filed by ResMed Inc.. (Blumenfeld, Jack) |
| Filing 7 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to answer, move or otherwise respond to the Complaint to July 28, 2021 - filed by ResMed Inc.. (Blumenfeld, Jack) |
|
SO ORDERED, re #7 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to answer, move or otherwise respond to the Complaint to July 28, 2021 filed by ResMed Inc. Set/Reset Answer Deadlines: ResMed Inc. answer due 7/28/2021. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 6/22/2021. (fms)
|
| Case Assigned to Judge Colm F. Connolly. Please include the initials of the Judge (CFC) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by New York University. ResMed Inc. served on 6/4/2021, answer due 6/25/2021. (Stamoulis, Stamatios) |
| Filing 5 Summonses Issued (please complete the top portion of the form and print out for use/service). (apk) |
| Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by New York University. (apk) |
| Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) US 9,867,955 B2 ;US 6,988,994 B2 ;US 9,168,344 B2 ;US 9,108,009 B2 ;US 9,427,539 B2 ;US 9,533,115 B2 ;US 10,384,024 B2. (apk) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (apk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT filed with Jury Demand against ResMed Inc. - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ADEDC-3628323.) - filed by New York University. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Civil Cover Sheet)(apk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: New York University v. ResMed Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: ResMed Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Jack B. Blumenfeld |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: New York University | |
| Represented By: | Stamatios Stamoulis |
| Represented By: | Richard Charles Weinblatt |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
