DataCloud Technologies, LLC v. Check Point Software Technologies Inc. et al
| DataCloud Technologies, LLC |
| Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. and Check Point Software Technologies Inc. |
| 1:2021cv00837 |
| June 8, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Leonard P Stark |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: identifying Corporate Parent Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. for Check Point Software Technologies Inc. filed by Check Point Software Technologies Inc.. (Moshos, Andrew) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim , MOTION for Joinder in Squarespace, Inc.'s Opening Brief in Support of Renewed Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings - filed by Check Point Software Technologies Inc.. (Moshos, Andrew) |
| Pro Hac Vice Attorney James F. McDonough, III for DataCloud Technologies, LLC added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (twk) |
| Pro Hac Vice Attorney Jonathan R. Miller for DataCloud Technologies, LLC added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (twk) |
SO ORDERED, re #8 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendant to respond to the Complaint to August 2, 2021 filed by DataCloud Technologies, LLC. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 7/1/21. (ntl)
|
| Filing 8 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendant to respond to the Complaint to August 2, 2021 - filed by DataCloud Technologies, LLC. (Stamoulis, Stamatios) |
|
SO ORDERED, re #7 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney James F. McDonough, III, Jonathan R. Miller, and Travis E. Lynch filed by DataCloud Technologies, LLC. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 6/30/21. (ntl)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney James F. McDonough, III, Jonathan R. Miller, and Travis E. Lynch - filed by DataCloud Technologies, LLC. (Stamoulis, Stamatios) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Leonard P. Stark. Please include the initials of the Judge (LPS) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by DataCloud Technologies, LLC. Check Point Software Technologies Inc. served on 6/11/2021, answer due 7/2/2021. (Stamoulis, Stamatios) |
| Filing 5 Summonses Issued (please complete the top portion of the form and print out for use/service). (Attachments: #1 Summons)(sam) |
| Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: identifying Corporate Parent Brainbox Innovations, LLC for DataCloud Technologies, LLC filed by DataCloud Technologies, LLC. (sam) |
| Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) US 6,560,613 B1 ;US 6,651,063 B1 ;US 7,209,959 B1 ;US 8,762,498 B2. (sam) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (sam) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed with Jury Demand against Check Point Software Technologies Inc., Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ADEDC-3631830.) - filed by DataCloud Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Civil Cover Sheet)(sam) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
