Vound Colorado, Ltd. et al v. E-Hounds, Inc.
Vound Colorado, Ltd. and Vound, LLC |
E-Hounds, Inc. |
1:2021cv00849 |
June 14, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Delaware |
Leonard P Stark |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. § 1121 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 REPLY BRIEF re #10 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Over the Person filed by E-Hounds, Inc.. (Aranilla, Artemio) |
Filing 17 DECLARATION re #16 Answering Brief in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss - Declaration of R. Peter Mercer by Vound Colorado, Ltd., Vound, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-2)(Silverstein, Alan) |
Filing 16 ANSWERING BRIEF in Opposition re #10 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Over the Person filed by Vound Colorado, Ltd., Vound, LLC.Reply Brief due date per Local Rules is 8/4/2021. (Silverstein, Alan) |
Filing 15 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Vound Colorado, Ltd., Vound, LLC. (Silverstein, Alan) |
Filing 14 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Vound Colorado, Ltd., Vound, LLC. E-Hounds, Inc. served on 6/16/2021, answer due 7/7/2021. (Silverstein, Alan) |
SO ORDERED, re #13 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Plaintiffs to file their opposition to Defendant's Motion To Dismiss to July 28, 2021 filed by Vound Colorado, Ltd., Vound, LLC. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 7/14/21. (ntl) |
Filing 13 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Plaintiffs to file their opposition to Defendant's Motion To Dismiss to July 28, 2021 - filed by Vound Colorado, Ltd., Vound, LLC. (Silverstein, Alan) |
Filing 12 SO ORDERED, re #9 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney David J. Shannon filed by E-Hounds, Inc.. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 7/8/2021. (etg) |
Filing 11 OPENING BRIEF in Support re #10 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Over the Person filed by E-Hounds, Inc..Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 7/21/2021. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Aranilla, Artemio) |
Filing 10 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Over the Person - filed by E-Hounds, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Aranilla, Artemio) |
Filing 9 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney David J. Shannon - filed by E-Hounds, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Certification by Counsel)(Aranilla, Artemio) |
Filing 8 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by E-Hounds, Inc.. (Aranilla, Artemio) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Artemio C. Aranilla, II on behalf of E-Hounds, Inc. (Aranilla, Artemio) |
Case Assigned to Judge Leonard P. Stark. Please include the initials of the Judge (LPS) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
Filing 6 Summonses Issued (please complete the top portion of the form and print out for use/service). (mal) |
Filing 5 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Vound Colorado, Ltd.. (mal) |
Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: identifying Corporate Parent Network and Perimeter Security Services Pty Ltd for Vound, LLC filed by Vound, LLC. (mal) |
Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 5,787,612. (mal) |
Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (mal) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed with Jury Demand against E-Hounds, Inc. - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ADEDC-3635125.) - filed by Vound Colorado, Ltd., Vound, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(mal) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.