General Scientific Corporation v. Den-Mat Holdings, LLC
| General Scientific Corporation doing business as SurgiTel |
| Den-Mat Holdings, LLC |
| 1:2021cv00882 |
| June 21, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Colm F Connolly |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. § 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 18
Letter to The Honorable Colm F. Connolly from Melanie K. Sharp regarding Request for Oral Argument on Defendant Den-Mat Holdings, LLC's Motion to Transfer - re #9 MOTION to Transfer Case to Central District of California - Western Division. (Sharp, Melanie)
|
|
Filing 17
REPLY BRIEF re #9 MOTION to Transfer Case to Central District of California - Western Division filed by Den-Mat Holdings, LLC. (Egan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 16
DECLARATION re #14 Answering Brief in Opposition [of Dr. Byung J. Chang in Support of Surgitel's Opposition to Den-Mat's Motion to Transfer Venue] by General Scientific Corporation. (Sharp, Melanie)
|
|
Filing 15
DECLARATION re #14 Answering Brief in Opposition [of Scott D. Barnett in Support of Surgitel's Opposition to Den-Mat's Motion to Transfer Venue] by General Scientific Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - E)(Sharp, Melanie)
|
|
Filing 14
ANSWERING BRIEF in Opposition re #9 MOTION to Transfer Case to Central District of California - Western Division filed by General Scientific Corporation.Reply Brief due date per Local Rules is 8/3/2021. (Sharp, Melanie)
|
|
Filing 13
Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: identifying Corporate Parent CP Dental LLC for Den-Mat Holdings, LLC filed by Den-Mat Holdings, LLC. (Egan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 12
DECLARATION re #9 MOTION to Transfer Case to Central District of California - Western Division -- Declaration of Todd Tiberi -- by Den-Mat Holdings, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exs. 1-4)(Egan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 11
DECLARATION re #9 MOTION to Transfer Case to Central District of California - Western Division -- Declaration of David Casper -- by Den-Mat Holdings, LLC. (Egan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 10
OPENING BRIEF in Support re #9 MOTION to Transfer Case to Central District of California - Western Division - filed by Den-Mat Holdings, LLC.Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 7/27/2021. (Egan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 9
MOTION to Transfer Case to Central District of California - Western Division - filed by Den-Mat Holdings, LLC. (Egan, Brian)
|
|
Pro Hac Vice Attorney Todd J. Tiberi for Den-Mat Holdings, LLC added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (myr)
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #8 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Todd J. Tiberi filed by Den-Mat Holdings, LLC. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 7/7/2021. (fms)
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Todd J. Tiberi - filed by Den-Mat Holdings, LLC. (Egan, Brian)
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #6 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney J. Michael Huget and Scott D. Barnett filed by General Scientific Corporation. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 6/24/2021. (nmf)
|
|
Case Assigned to Judge Colm F. Connolly. Please include the initials of the Judge (CFC) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb)
|
|
Filing 7
Return of Service Executed by General Scientific Corporation. Den-Mat Holdings, LLC served on 6/22/2021, answer due 7/13/2021. (Sharp, Melanie)
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney J. Michael Huget and Scott D. Barnett - filed by General Scientific Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Certification By Counsel to Be Admitted Pro Hac Vice)(mal)
|
|
Filing 5
Summonses Issued (please complete the top portion of the form and print out for use/service). (mal)
|
|
Filing 4
Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by General Scientific Corporation. (mal)
|
|
Filing 3
Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 8,047,684 ;8,662,709. (mal)
|
|
Filing 2
Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (mal)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT - filed with Jury Demand against Den-Mat Holdings, LLC - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ADEDC-3639773.) - filed by General Scientific Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-D), #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (mal).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: General Scientific Corporation v. Den-Mat Holdings, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: General Scientific Corporation doing business as SurgiTel | |
| Represented By: | Melanie K. Sharp |
| Represented By: | James L. Higgins |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Den-Mat Holdings, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Brian P. Egan |
| Represented By: | Todd J. Tiberi |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
