Fedder v. Saul
Christopher Fedder |
Andrew Saul and Kilolo Kijakazi |
1:2021cv00990 |
July 6, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Delaware |
Colm F Connolly |
Jennifer L Hall |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Hall. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 7/15/2021. (nmf) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Heather Benderson on behalf of Kilolo Kijakazi (Benderson, Heather) |
SO ORDERED, re #4 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney James J. Gannon filed by Christopher Fedder. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 7/14/2021. (nmf) |
Case Assigned to Judge Colm F. Connolly. Please include the initials of the Judge (CFC) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney James J. Gannon - filed by Christopher Fedder. (Linarducci, Gary) |
Filing 3 Summonses Issued (please complete the top portion of the form and print out for use/service). (kmd) |
Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (kmd) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed against Andrew Saul - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. (Filing fee $402, receipt number ADEDC-3650966.) - filed by Christopher Fedder. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(kmd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.