Consumeron, LLC v. MapleBear Inc.
| Consumeron, LLC |
| MapleBear Inc. a Delaware corporation doing business as Instacart |
| 1:2021cv01147 |
| August 6, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Leonard P Stark |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 1 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Pro Hac Vice Attorneys Michelle S. Ybarra, David J. Silbert, Christopher S. Sun, and Bilal Malik for MapleBear Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (srs)
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #8 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney David J. Silbert, Michelle Ybarra, Christopher S. Sun and Bilal Malik filed by MapleBear Inc. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 9/30/21. (ntl)
|
|
Filing 11
Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by MapleBear Inc.. (Fry, David)
|
|
Filing 10
OPENING BRIEF in Support re #9 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by MapleBear Inc..Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 10/13/2021. (Fry, David)
|
|
Filing 9
MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim - filed by MapleBear Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Fry, David)
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney David J. Silbert, Michelle Ybarra, Christopher S. Sun and Bilal Malik - filed by MapleBear Inc.. (Fry, David)
|
|
Pro Hac Vice Attorney Lisa Kobialka, James R. Hannah, Christina M. Finn, Paul J. Andre for Consumeron, LLC added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (twk)
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #7 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Paul J. Andre, Lisa Kobialka, James Hannah and Christina M. Finn filed by Consumeron, LLC. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 9/8/21. (ntl)
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Paul J. Andre, Lisa Kobialka, James Hannah and Christina M. Finn - filed by Consumeron, LLC. (Rovner, Philip)
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #6 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to Answer Complaint to September 29, 2021 filed by MapleBear Inc. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 8/31/21. (ntl)
|
|
Filing 6
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to Answer Complaint to September 29, 2021 - filed by MapleBear Inc.. (Fry, David)
|
|
Case Assigned to Judge Leonard P. Stark. Please include the initials of the Judge (LPS) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb)
|
|
Filing 5
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Consumeron, LLC. MapleBear Inc. served on 8/9/2021, answer due 8/30/2021. (Rovner, Philip)
|
|
Filing 4
Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed - filed by Consumeron, LLC. (kmd)
|
|
Filing 3
Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) US 8,244,594 B2; US 9,202,191 B2; US 10,115,067 B2; US 10,628,835 B2. (kmd)
|
|
Filing 2
Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (kmd)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement filed with Jury Demand against MapleBear Inc. - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. (Filing fee $402, receipt number ADEDC-3674364.) - filed by Consumeron, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-13, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(kmd)
|
|
No Summons Issued. (kmd)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
