ETAK Systems, LLC v. B+T Group Holdings Inc.
| ETAK Systems, LLC |
| B+T GROUP HOLDINGS INC. |
| 1:2021cv01149 |
| August 6, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Richard G Andrews |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Stipulation and Proposed Order Extending Time to Respond to Complaint to October 18, 2021 - filed by B+T Group Holdings Inc.. (Wood, Larry) Modified on 9/29/2021 (nms). |
SO ORDERED, re #9 Stipulation and Proposed Order Extending Time to Respond to Complaint (*Reset Answer Deadlines: B+T Group Holdings Inc. answer due 10/18/2021). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 9/29/2021. (nms)
|
| Pro Hac Vice Attorney Olivia E. Marbutt for ETAK Systems, LLC added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (srs) |
| Pro Hac Vice Attorney Stephen R. Risley for ETAK Systems, LLC added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (mal) |
|
SO ORDERED, re #8 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Daniel A. Kent, Stephen R. Risley, and Olivia E. Marbutt, filed by ETAK Systems, LLC. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 9/15/2021. (nms)
|
| Pro Hac Vice Attorney Daniel A. Kent for ETAK Systems, LLC added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (srs) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Daniel A. Kent, Stephen R. Risley, and Olivia E. Marbutt - filed by ETAK Systems, LLC. (Weinblatt, Richard) |
|
SO ORDERED, re #7 STIPULATION and Proposed Order Extending Time to Respond to Complaint (*Reset Answer Deadlines: B+T Group Holdings Inc. answer due 9/30/2021). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 8/24/2021. (nms)
|
| Filing 7 STIPULATION and Proposed Order Extending Time to Respond to Complaint - filed by B+T GROUP HOLDINGS INC.. (McCune, Brandon) Modified on 8/24/2021 (nms). |
| Case Assigned to Judge Richard G. Andrews. Please include the initials of the Judge (RGA) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by ETAK Systems, LLC. B+T GROUP HOLDINGS INC. served on 8/10/2021, answer due 8/31/2021. (Weinblatt, Richard) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued with Magistrate Consent Notice attached as to B+T GROUP HOLDINGS INC. on 8/9/2021. (twk) |
| Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: identifying Corporate Parent ADB Companies, LLC, Other Affiliate Warren Equity Partners for ETAK Systems, LLC filed by ETAK Systems, LLC. (twk) |
| Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 9,704,292; 10,334,164; 10,354,441; 10,395,434; 10,728,767; 10,827,363. (twk) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (twk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement with Jury Demand against B+T Group Holdings Inc. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ADEDC-3674453) - filed by ETAK Systems, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K, #12 Exhibit L, #13 Civil Cover Sheet)(twk) Modified on 8/24/2021 (nms). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
