Mergenthaler v. Enzolytics, Inc.
| Peter Mergenthaler |
| Enzolytics, Inc. |
| 1:2021cv01163 |
| August 11, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Richard G Andrews |
| Stockholders Suits |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
OPENING BRIEF in Support re #7 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Enzolytics, Inc..Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 10/18/2021. (Garibian, Antranig)
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION to Dismiss - filed by Enzolytics, Inc.. (Attachments: #2 Certificate of Service)(Garibian, Antranig) Modified on 10/4/2021 (nms).
|
|
Filing 6
Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Enzolytics, Inc.. (Garibian, Antranig)
|
|
CORRECTING ENTRY: The brief filed as an attachment to the motion at D.I. #7 has been removed. Motions and briefs are to be filed independent of each other. Counsel shall refile the brief accordingly. (nms)
|
|
Filing 5
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME Defendant's time to reply or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint to October 4, 2021 - filed by Enzolytics, Inc.. (Garibian, Antranig)
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #5 STIPULATION Extending Time to Respond to Complaint (*Reset Answer Deadlines: Enzolytics, Inc. answer due 10/4/2021). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 8/27/2021. (nms)
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #3 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Mark J. Kallenbach, filed by Peter Mergenthaler. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 8/18/2021. (nms)
|
|
Case Assigned to Judge Richard G. Andrews. Please include the initials of the Judge (RGA) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb)
|
|
Filing 4
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Peter Mergenthaler. Enzolytics, Inc. served on 8/12/2021, answer due 9/2/2021. (Edmonson, Jamie)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Mark J. Kallenbach - filed by Peter Mergenthaler. (Edmonson, Jamie)
|
|
Filing 2
Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (myr)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT filed with Jury Demand against Enzolytics, Inc. - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ADEDC-3676490.) - filed by Peter Mergenthaler. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Civil Cover Sheet)(myr)
|
|
No Summons Issued. (myr)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Mergenthaler v. Enzolytics, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Peter Mergenthaler | |
| Represented By: | Jamie Lynne Edmonson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Enzolytics, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Antranig N. Garibian |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
