Digital Cache, LLC v. PNY Technologies, Inc.
| Digital Cache, LLC |
| PNY Technologies, Inc. |
| 1:2021cv01169 |
| August 12, 2021 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Leonard P Stark |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks. (ntl) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Digital Cache, LLC as to PNY Technologies (deBruin, David) |
SO ORDERED, re #8 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Neil J. McNabnay filed by PNY Technologies, Inc. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 9/10/21. (ntl)
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #9 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Digital Cache, LLC, ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 9/10/21. (ntl)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Neil J. McNabnay - filed by PNY Technologies, Inc.. (Anderson, Jeremy) |
|
SO ORDERED, re #7 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to ANSWER Complaint to October 7, 2021 filed by PNY Technologies, Inc. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 9/8/21. (ntl)
|
| Filing 7 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to ANSWER Complaint to October 7, 2021 - filed by PNY Technologies, Inc.. (Anderson, Jeremy) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Digital Cache, LLC. PNY Technologies, Inc. served on 8/17/2021, answer due 9/7/2021. (deBruin, David) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Leonard P. Stark. Please include the initials of the Judge (LPS) after the case number on all documents filed. Associated Cases: 1:21-cv-01166-LPS, 1:21-cv-01167-LPS, 1:21-cv-01168-LPS, 1:21-cv-01169-LPS, 1:21-cv-01170-LPS (rjb) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued with Magistrate Consent Notice attached as to PNY Technologies, Inc. on 8/12/2021. (twk) |
| Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Digital Cache, LLC. (twk) |
| Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 6,851,015. (twk) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (twk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT filed with Jury Demand against PNY Technologies, Inc. - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ADEDC-3677560.) - filed by Digital Cache, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(twk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Digital Cache, LLC v. PNY Technologies, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Digital Cache, LLC | |
| Represented By: | David W. deBruin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: PNY Technologies, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Jeremy Douglas Anderson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
