Jones v. May et al
| Timothy D. Jones, Shakir A. Jones, Shakir Taqi Ahmad and Timothy D. Jones, Sr. |
| Robert May and Kathleen Jennings |
| 1:2021cv01192 |
| August 20, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Richard G Andrews |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 MOTION to Appoint Counsel - filed by Shakir A. Jones. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(apk) |
| Filing 4 Remark: Name and SBI# confirmation provided by DE Department of Corrections. Primary name changed to Shakir A. Jones. (srs) Modified on 9/13/2021 (nms). |
| Remark: SBI# Confirmation Request Sent to DDOC. (srs) |
| Filing 3 Return of Undeliverable Mail sent to Timothy D. Jones. (srs) |
| Remark: Resending Notice of Case Assignment NEF to Alias of Plaintiff Shakir A. Jones. (srs) |
| Remark: Filing Fee Paid: $5, DEX036118 (twk) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Richard G. Andrews. Please include the initials of the Judge (RGA) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (apk) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus(NO IFP, NO FILING FEE) - filed by Timothy D. Jones. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(apk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
