Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Allied Vision Technologies, Inc.
| Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. |
| Allied Vision Technologies, Inc. |
| 1:2021cv01285 |
| September 10, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Richard G Andrews |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 STIPULATON and Proposed Order to Extend Time - filed by Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.. (deBruin, David) Modified on 10/6/2021 (nms). |
SO ORDERED, re #7 STIPULATON and Proposed Order to Extend Time (*Reset Answer Deadlines: Allied Vision Technologies, Inc. answer due 11/12/2021). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 10/6/2021. (nms)
|
| Filing 6 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: identifying filed by Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.. (deBruin, David) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.. Allied Vision Technologies, Inc. served on 9/21/2021, answer due 10/12/2021. (deBruin, David) |
| CORRECTING ENTRY: The executed summons filed at D.I. 5 on 9/21/2021, has been removed from the docket. An incorrect service date was used for calculating the answer deadline. Plaintiff indicated the summons was served on 9/20/2021, but upon review of the filing it was determined the summons was served on 9/21/2021. Plaintiff shall refile the executed summons using the correct service date. (nms) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Richard G. Andrews. Please include the initials of the Judge (RGA) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued with Magistrate Consent Notice attached as to Allied Vision Technologies, Inc. on 9/10/2021. (mal) |
| Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 6,972,790 ;8,537,242. (mal) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (mal) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT - filed with Jury Demand against Allied Vision Technologies, Inc. - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ADEDC-3696208.) - filed by Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(mal) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Allied Vision Technologies, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. | |
| Represented By: | David W. deBruin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Allied Vision Technologies, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
