Stormborn Technologies LLC v. Mirion Technologies, Inc.
| Stormborn Technologies LLC |
| Mirion Technologies, Inc. |
| 1:2021cv01366 |
| September 28, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Maryellen Noreika |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 1 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to Answer the Complaint to 12/27/2021 - filed by Stormborn Technologies LLC. (Chong, Jimmy) |
SO ORDERED, re #8 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to Answer the Complaint to 12/27/2021 filed by Stormborn Technologies LLC. Set/Reset Answer Deadlines: Mirion Technologies, Inc. answer due 12/27/2021. Ordered by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 10/18/2021. (asw)
|
| Pro Hac Vice Attorney Howard L. Wernow for Stormborn Technologies LLC added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (srs) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Howard L. Wernow - filed by Stormborn Technologies LLC. (Chong, Jimmy) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Stormborn Technologies LLC. Mirion Technologies, Inc. served on 10/5/2021, answer due 10/26/2021. (Chong, Jimmy) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Maryellen Noreika. Please include the initials of the Judge (MN) after the case number on all documents filed. Associated Cases: 1:21-cv-01366-MN, 1:21-cv-01367-MN (rjb) |
|
SO ORDERED re #7 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Howard L. Wernow filed by Stormborn Technologies LLC. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 10/6/2021. (dlw)
|
| Filing 5 Summons Issued with Magistrate Consent Notice attached as to Mirion Technologies, Inc. on 9/28/2021. (myr) |
| Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Stormborn Technologies LLC. (myr) |
| Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) U.S. RE44,199 E. (myr) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (myr) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR INFRINGEMENT OF PATENT filed with Jury Demand against Mirion Technologies, Inc. - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ADEDC-3708895.) - filed by Stormborn Technologies LLC. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Compliance A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(myr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Stormborn Technologies LLC v. Mirion Technologies, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Stormborn Technologies LLC | |
| Represented By: | Jimmy C. Chong |
| Represented By: | Howard L. Wernow |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Mirion Technologies, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
