Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Fantasia Trading LLC
| Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. |
| Fantasia Trading LLC doing business as AnkerDirect |
| 1:2021cv01428 |
| October 7, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Richard G Andrews |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 1 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: identifying Corporate Parent Anker Innovations Limited for Fantasia Trading LLC filed by Fantasia Trading LLC. (Lu, Zhun) |
| Filing 9 OPENING BRIEF in Support re #8 MOTION to Dismiss, filed by Fantasia Trading LLC.Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 12/13/2021. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Lu, Zhun) Modified on 11/30/2021 (nms). |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim - filed by Fantasia Trading LLC. (Lu, Zhun) |
| Filing 7 Unopposed Motion to Extend Time to File Answer - filed by Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.. (deBruin, David) Modified on 10/20/2021 (nms). |
SO ORDERED, re #7 Unopposed Motion to Extend Time to File Answer (*Reset Answer Deadlines: Fantasia Trading LLC answer due 11/29/2021). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 10/20/2021. (nms)
|
| Case Assigned to Judge Richard G. Andrews. Please include the initials of the Judge (RGA) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.. Fantasia Trading LLC served on 10/8/2021, answer due 10/29/2021. (deBruin, David) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued with Magistrate Consent Notice attached as to Fantasia Trading LLC on 10/7/2021. (srs) |
| Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.. (srs) |
| Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 6,972,790 ;8,165,867 ;8,537,242. (srs) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (srs) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT filed with Jury Demand against Fantasia Trading LLC - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ADEDC-3716042.) - filed by Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Civil Cover Sheet)(srs) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Fantasia Trading LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. | |
| Represented By: | David W. deBruin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Fantasia Trading LLC doing business as AnkerDirect | |
| Represented By: | Zhun Lu |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
