Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al v. Netlist, Inc.
| Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Semiconductor, Inc. |
| Netlist, Inc. |
| 1:2021cv01453 |
| October 15, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Richard G Andrews |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 1 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
SO ORDERED, re #9 STIPULATION to Extend Time (*Reset Answer Deadlines: Netlist, Inc. answer due 1/19/2022). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 12/9/2021. (nms)
|
|
Filing 9
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to move, plead, or otherwise respond to the Complaint to January 19, 2022 - filed by Netlist, Inc.. (Hoeschen, Nathan)
|
|
Pro Hac Vice Attorney Brian Nester for Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Semiconductor, Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (twk)
|
|
Pro Hac Vice Attorney Thomas Garten for Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Semiconductor, Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (twk)
|
|
Pro Hac Vice Attorneys Alice J. Ahn and Peter A. Swanson for Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Semiconductor, Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (srs)
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Brian Nester, Alice J. Ahn, Peter A. Swanson and Thomas Garten - filed by Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc.. (Smith, Rodger)
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #8 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Brian Nester, Alice J. Ahn, Peter A. Swanson and Thomas Garten, filed by Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc.. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 11/16/2021. (nms)
|
|
Filing 7
STIPULATION to Extend Time - filed by Netlist, Inc.. (Hoeschen, Nathan) Modified on 11/10/2021 (nms).
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #7 STIPULATION to Extend Time (*Reset Answer Deadlines: Netlist, Inc. answer due 12/20/2021). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 11/10/2021. (nms)
|
|
Filing 6
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.. Netlist, Inc. served on 10/28/2021, answer due 11/18/2021. (Smith, Rodger)
|
|
Case Assigned to Judge Richard G. Andrews. Please include the initials of the Judge (RGA) after the case number on all documents filed. (nms)
|
|
Filing 5
Summons Issued with Magistrate Consent Notice attached as to Netlist, Inc. on 10/15/2021. (mal)
|
|
Filing 4
Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: identifying Corporate Parent Samsung Electronics America, Inc., for Samsung Semiconductor, Inc. filed by Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc.. (mal)
|
|
Filing 3
Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 10,217,523 ;10,474,595 ;9,858,218 ;7,619,912. (mal)
|
|
Filing 2
Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (mal)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT filed with Jury Demand against Netlist, Inc. - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ADEDC-3721308.) - filed by Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-E, #2 Exhibit F, #3 Exhibit G-T, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(mal)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
