Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al v. Aurobindo Pharma Ltd. et al.
Plaintiff: Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH and Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation
Defendant: Aurobindo Pharma Ltd. and Aurobindo Pharma USA, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2021cv01485
Filed: October 22, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Delaware
Presiding Judge: Colm F Connolly
Nature of Suit: Patent - Abbreviated New Drug Application(ANDA)
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 1, 2021 Filing 10 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to Answer, Move, or Otherwise Respond to the Complaint to January 18, 2022 - filed by Aurobindo Pharma Ltd., Aurobindo Pharma USA, Inc.. (Connolly, Arthur)
December 1, 2021 Opinion or Order SO ORDERED, re #10 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to Answer, Move, or Otherwise Respond to the Complaint to January 18, 2022, filed by Aurobindo Pharma USA, Inc., Aurobindo Pharma Ltd. Reset Answer Deadlines: Aurobindo Pharma Ltd. answer due 1/18/2022; Aurobindo Pharma USA, Inc. answer due 1/18/2022. Ordered by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 12/1/2021. (kmd)
November 10, 2021 Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH. Aurobindo Pharma USA, Inc. served on 11/9/2021, answer due 11/30/2021. (Dellinger, Megan)
November 10, 2021 Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH. Aurobindo Pharma Ltd. served on 11/9/2021, answer due 11/30/2021. (Dellinger, Megan)
October 27, 2021 Case Assigned to Judge Colm F. Connolly. Please include the initials of the Judge (CFC) after the case number on all documents filed. Associated Cases: 1:21-cv-01485-CFC, 1:21-cv-01486-CFC, 1:21-cv-01487-CFC (rjb)
October 22, 2021 Filing 7 Summons Issued with Magistrate Consent Notice attached as to Aurobindo Pharma Ltd. on 10/22/2021. (twk)
October 22, 2021 Filing 6 Summons Issued with Magistrate Consent Notice attached as to Aurobindo Pharma USA, Inc. on 10/22/2021. (twk)
October 22, 2021 Filing 5 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: identifying Corporate Parent C. H. Boehringer Sohn AG & Co. KG for Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc. filed by Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc.. (twk)
October 22, 2021 Filing 4 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 11,090,323 B2. (twk)
October 22, 2021 Filing 3 Supplemental information for patent cases involving an Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) - Date Patentee(s) Received Notice: Not earlier than October 8, 2021. Date of Expiration of Patent: April 3, 2034. (twk)
October 22, 2021 Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (twk)
October 22, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed against Aurobindo Pharma Ltd., Aurobindo Pharma USA, Inc. - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ADEDC-3727443.) - filed by Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(twk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al v. Aurobindo Pharma Ltd. et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Represented By: Jack B. Blumenfeld
Represented By: Brian P. Egan
Represented By: Megan Elizabeth Dellinger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH
Represented By: Jack B. Blumenfeld
Represented By: Brian P. Egan
Represented By: Megan Elizabeth Dellinger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation
Represented By: Jack B. Blumenfeld
Represented By: Brian P. Egan
Represented By: Megan Elizabeth Dellinger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Aurobindo Pharma Ltd.
Represented By: Arthur G. Connolly, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Aurobindo Pharma USA, Inc.
Represented By: Arthur G. Connolly, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?