Aperture Net LLC v. Ubiquiti Inc.
Plaintiff: Aperture Net LLC
Defendant: Ubiquiti Inc.
Case Number: 1:2021cv01677
Filed: November 24, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Delaware
Presiding Judge: Richard G Andrews
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 18, 2022 Pro Hac Vice Attorneys Neil J. McNabnay, Philip G. Brown, and Ricardo J. Bonilla for Ubiquiti Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (twk)
January 12, 2022 Filing 10 ANSWER to #7 Answer to Complaint and Counterclaims, by Aperture Net LLC.(Chong, Jimmy) Modified on 1/13/2022 (nms).
January 7, 2022 Filing 9 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Neil J. McNabnay, Ricardo J. Bonilla, Michael A. Vincent, and Philip G. Brown - filed by Ubiquiti Inc.. (Anderson, Jeremy)
January 7, 2022 Opinion or Order SO ORDERED, re #9 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Neil J. McNabnay, Ricardo J. Bonilla, Michael A. Vincent, and Philip G. Brown, filed by Ubiquiti Inc.. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 1/7/2022. (nms)
December 22, 2021 Filing 8 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Ubiquiti Inc.. (Anderson, Jeremy)
December 22, 2021 Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand , COUNTERCLAIM against Aperture Net LLC by Ubiquiti Inc..(Anderson, Jeremy)
December 2, 2021 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Aperture Net LLC. Ubiquiti Inc. served on 12/1/2021, answer due 12/22/2021. (Chong, Jimmy)
December 1, 2021 Case Assigned to Judge Richard G. Andrews. Please include the initials of the Judge (RGA) after the case number on all documents filed. Associated Cases: 1:21-cv-01675-RGA, 1:21-cv-01676-RGA, 1:21-cv-01677-RGA (rjb)
November 24, 2021 Filing 5 Summonses Issued (please complete the top portion of the form and print out for use/service). (nmg)
November 24, 2021 Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Aperture Net LLC. (nmg)
November 24, 2021 Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 6,711,204. (nmg)
November 24, 2021 Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (nmg)
November 24, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT for PATENT INFRINGEMENT filed with Jury Demand against Ubiquiti Inc. - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ADEDC-3750635.) - filed by Aperture Net LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(nmg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Aperture Net LLC v. Ubiquiti Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Aperture Net LLC
Represented By: Jimmy C. Chong
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ubiquiti Inc.
Represented By: Neil J. McNabnay
Represented By: Philip G. Brown
Represented By: Ricardo J. Bonilla
Represented By: Jeremy Douglas Anderson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?