Genzyme Corporation et al v. Novartis Gene Therapies, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Genzyme Corporation and Aventis Inc.
Defendant: Novartis Gene Therapies, Inc., Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation and Novartis AG
Case Number: 1:2021cv01736
Filed: December 10, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Delaware
Presiding Judge: Richard G Andrews
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 1
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Pro Hac Vice Attorneys Michael R. Galgano, Cora R. Holt, John D. Livingstone, and Amanda K. Murphy for Novartis AG, Novartis Gene Therapies, Inc.,and Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (srs)
January 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 16 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney John Livingstone, Amanda Murphy, Ph.D., Cora Holt, and Michael Galgano - filed by Novartis AG, Novartis Gene Therapies, Inc., Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation. (Silver, Daniel)
January 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Pro Hac Vice Attorneys Bryan G. Helwig, Nicole E. Grimm, George T. Lyons, III, Paul H. Berghoff, Joshua R. Rich, and Alexandra E. MacKenzie for Aventis Inc., and Genzyme Corporation added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (twk)
January 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Pro Hac Vice Attorney Bryan G. Helwig, Joshua R. Rich, Paul H. Berghoff, Alexandra E. MacKenzie, Nicole E. Grimm, and George T. Lyons, III for Aventis Inc. and Genzyme Corporation added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (mal)
January 5, 2022 Opinion or Order SO ORDERED, re #16 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney John Livingstone, Amanda Murphy, Ph.D., Cora Holt, and Michael Galgano, filed by Novartis AG, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Novartis Gene Therapies, Inc.. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 1/5/2022. (nms)
January 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to move, answer, or otherwise respond to Complaint to April 4, 2022 - filed by Novartis AG, Novartis Gene Therapies, Inc., Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation. (Silver, Daniel)
January 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Alexandra E. MacKenzie - filed by Aventis Inc., Genzyme Corporation. (Wilks, David)
January 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Bryan G. Helwig, Ph.D - filed by Aventis Inc., Genzyme Corporation. (Wilks, David)
January 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney George T. Lyons, III - filed by Aventis Inc., Genzyme Corporation. (Wilks, David)
January 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Nicole E. Grimm - filed by Aventis Inc., Genzyme Corporation. (Wilks, David)
January 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Joshua R. Rich - filed by Aventis Inc., Genzyme Corporation. (Wilks, David)
January 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Paul H. Berghoff - filed by Aventis Inc., Genzyme Corporation. (Wilks, David)
January 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Genzyme Corporation, Aventis Inc.: For Novartis AG waiver sent on 1/3/2022, answer due 3/4/2022. (Wilks, David)
January 4, 2022 Opinion or Order SO ORDERED, re #15 STIPULATION and Proposed Order to Extend Time (*Reset Answer Deadlines: Novartis AG answer due 4/4/2022; Novartis Gene Therapies, Inc. answer due 4/4/2022; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation answer due 4/4/2022). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 1/4/2022. (nms)
January 4, 2022 Opinion or Order SO ORDERED, re #14 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Alexandra E. MacKenzie, filed by Aventis Inc., Genzyme Corporation, #12 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney George T. Lyons, III, filed by Aventis Inc., Genzyme Corporation, #13 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Bryan G. Helwig, Ph.D, filed by Aventis Inc., Genzyme Corporation, #11 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Nicole E. Grimm, filed by Aventis Inc., Genzyme Corporation, and #10 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Joshua R. Rich, filed by Aventis Inc., Genzyme Corporation. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 1/4/2022. (nms)
January 4, 2022 Opinion or Order SO ORDERED, re #9 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Paul H. Berghoff, filed by Aventis Inc., Genzyme Corporation. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 1/4/2022. (nms)
January 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel M. Silver on behalf of Novartis AG, Novartis Gene Therapies, Inc., Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation (Silver, Daniel)
December 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Genzyme Corporation, Aventis Inc.. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation served on 12/15/2021, answer due 1/5/2022. (Wilks, David)
December 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Genzyme Corporation, Aventis Inc.. Novartis Gene Therapies, Inc. served on 12/15/2021, answer due 1/5/2022. (Wilks, David)
December 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Case Assigned to Judge Richard G. Andrews. Please include the initials of the Judge (RGA) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb)
December 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 6,596,535 ;7,125,717 ;7,785,888 ;7,846,729 ;8,093,054. (nmg)
December 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: identifying Corporate Parent Sanofi for Aventis Inc., Genzyme Corporation filed by Aventis Inc., Genzyme Corporation. (Wilks, David)
December 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (myr)
December 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed with Jury Demand against Novartis AG, Novartis Gene Therapies, Inc., Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ADEDC-3760297.) - filed by Genzyme Corporation, Aventis Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Civil Cover Sheet)(myr)
December 10, 2021 Opinion or Order No Summons Issued. (myr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Genzyme Corporation et al v. Novartis Gene Therapies, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Genzyme Corporation
Represented By: David E. Wilks
Represented By: Scott B. Czerwonka
Represented By: Alexandra E. MacKenzie
Represented By: Bryan G. Helwig
Represented By: George T. Lyons, III
Represented By: Joshua R. Rich
Represented By: Nicole E. Grimm
Represented By: Paul H. Berghoff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Aventis Inc.
Represented By: David E. Wilks
Represented By: Scott B. Czerwonka
Represented By: Alexandra E. MacKenzie
Represented By: Bryan G. Helwig
Represented By: George T. Lyons, III
Represented By: Joshua R. Rich
Represented By: Nicole E. Grimm
Represented By: Paul H. Berghoff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Novartis Gene Therapies, Inc.
Represented By: Daniel M. Silver
Represented By: Amanda K. Murphy
Represented By: Cora R. Holt
Represented By: John D. Livingstone
Represented By: Michael R. Galgano
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
Represented By: Daniel M. Silver
Represented By: Amanda K. Murphy
Represented By: Cora R. Holt
Represented By: John D. Livingstone
Represented By: Michael R. Galgano
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Novartis AG
Represented By: Daniel M. Silver
Represented By: Amanda K. Murphy
Represented By: Cora R. Holt
Represented By: John D. Livingstone
Represented By: Michael R. Galgano
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?