Brita LP v. Zero Technologies LLC et al
Plaintiff: Brita LP
Defendant: Zero Technologies LLC and Culligan International Company
Case Number: 1:2021cv01801
Filed: December 23, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Delaware
Presiding Judge: Richard G Andrews
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER: The case is ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED. The parties shall promptly notify the Court when the "ITC" action has been resolved so that this case may be reopened and other appropriate action may be taken. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 1/13/2022. (nms)
January 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 SO ORDERED, Granting #8 Stipulation and Proposed Order for Stay. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 1/13/2022. (nms)
January 13, 2022 Filing 8 STIPULATION and [Proposed] Order for Stay Pending ITC Investigation by Culligan International Company, Zero Technologies LLC. (Lyons, Jeffrey)
December 29, 2021 Case Assigned to Judge Richard G. Andrews. Please include the initials of the Judge (RGA) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb)
December 28, 2021 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Brita LP. Culligan International Company served on 12/27/2021, answer due 1/18/2022. (Poff, Adam)
December 28, 2021 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Brita LP. Zero Technologies LLC served on 12/27/2021, answer due 1/18/2022. (Poff, Adam)
December 23, 2021 Filing 5 Summons Issued with Magistrate Consent Notice attached as to Culligan International Company on 12/23/2021; Zero Technologies LLC on 12/23/2021. (Attachments: #1 Summons Issued)(apk)
December 23, 2021 Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: identifying Corporate Parent The Clorox Company for Brita LP filed by Brita LP. (apk)
December 23, 2021 Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 8,167,141. (apk)
December 23, 2021 Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (apk)
December 23, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT filed with Jury Demand against Culligan International Company, Zero Technologies LLC - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ADEDC-3769503.) - filed by Brita LP. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(apk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brita LP v. Zero Technologies LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brita LP
Represented By: Adam Wyatt Poff
Represented By: Samantha G. Wilson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Zero Technologies LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Culligan International Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?