Harbour Antibodies BV et al v. Teneobio, Inc.
| Harbour Antibodies BV, Harbour Antibodies HCAb BV, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam and Dr. Roger Kingdon Craig |
| Teneobio, Inc. |
| 1:2021cv01807 |
| December 23, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Maryellen Noreika |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 1 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
SO ORDERED re #8 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for defendant to respond to the Complaint to March 4, 2022 (Set/Reset Answer Deadlines: Teneobio, Inc. answer due 3/4/2022). ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 1/11/2022. (dlw)
|
| Filing 8 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for defendant to respond to the Complaint to March 4, 2022 - filed by Teneobio, Inc.. (Blumenfeld, Jack) |
| Pro Hac Vice Attorneys Henry Fildes, Susan Krumplitsch, Lisa Lint, Andrew Regan, Ellen A. Scordino, and Michael A. Sitzman for Roger Kingdon Craig, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Harbour Antibodies BV, and Harbour Antibodies HCAb BV added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (srs) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Michael Sitzman, Susan Krumplitsch, Andrew Regan, Ellen Scordino, Lisa Lint, and Henry Fildes - filed by Roger Kingdon Craig, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Harbour Antibodies BV, Harbour Antibodies HCAb BV. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Certification of Michael Sitzman, #3 Certification of Susan Krumplitsch, #4 Certification of Andrew Regan, #5 Certification of Ellen Scordino, #6 Certification of Lisa Lint, #7 Certification of Henry Fildes)(Biggs, Brian) |
|
SO ORDERED re #7 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Michael Sitzman, Susan Krumplitsch, Andrew Regan, Ellen Scordino, Lisa Lint, and Henry Fildes filed by Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Harbour Antibodies HCAb BV, Harbour Antibodies BV, Roger Kingdon Craig. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 1/3/2022. (dlw)
|
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Harbour Antibodies BV, Harbour Antibodies HCAb BV, Roger Kingdon Craig, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam. Teneobio, Inc. served on 12/27/2021, answer due 1/18/2022. (Biggs, Brian) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Maryellen Noreika. Please include the initials of the Judge (MN) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued with Magistrate Consent Notice attached as to Teneobio, Inc. on 12/27/2021. (smg) |
| Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: identifying Corporate Parent HBM Holdings Limited (Cayman) for Harbour Antibodies BV, Harbour Antibodies HCAb BV filed by Harbour Antibodies BV, Harbour Antibodies HCAb BV. (smg) |
| Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) US9,346,877 B2 ; US 9,353,179 B2 ; US 10,906,970 B2 ; US 10,993,420 B2. (smg) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (smg) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed with Jury Demand against Teneobio, Inc. - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ADEDC-3769782.) - filed by Harbour Antibodies BV, Harbour Antibodies HCAb BV, Roger Kingdon Craig, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Civil Cover Sheet)(smg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
