DivX, LLC v. TCL Technology Group Corporation et al
| DivX, LLC |
| TCL Technology Group Corporation, TCL Electronics Holdings Limited, TTE Technology, Inc., Shenzhen TCL New Technologies Co. Ltd., TCL King Electrical Appliances (Huizhou) Co. Ltd., TCL MOKA International Limited and TCL Smart Device (Vietnam) Co. Ltd. |
| 1:2021cv01828 |
| December 28, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Colm F Connolly |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Frederick L. Cottrell, III on behalf of Shenzhen TCL New Technologies Co. Ltd., TCL Electronics Holdings Limited, TCL King Electrical Appliances (Huizhou) Co. Ltd., TCL MOKA International Limited, TCL Smart Device (Vietnam) Co. Ltd., TCL Technology Group Corporation, TTE Technology, Inc. (Cottrell, Frederick) |
| Filing 6 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to respond to the Complaint to March 21, 2022 - filed by Shenzhen TCL New Technologies Co. Ltd., TCL Electronics Holdings Limited, TCL King Electrical Appliances (Huizhou) Co. Ltd., TCL MOKA International Limited, TCL Smart Device (Vietnam) Co. Ltd., TCL Technology Group Corporation, TTE Technology, Inc.. (Haynes, Christine) |
SO ORDERED, re #6 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to respond to the Complaint to March 21, 2022, filed by TCL MOKA International Limited, Shenzhen TCL New Technologies Co. Ltd., TCL Smart Device (Vietnam) Co. Ltd., TCL King Electrical Appliances (Huizhou) Co. Ltd., TTE Technology, Inc., TCL Electronics Holdings Limited, TCL Technology Group Corporation. Reset Answer Deadlines: Shenzhen TCL New Technologies Co. Ltd. answer due 3/21/2022; TCL Electronics Holdings Limited answer due 3/21/2022; TCL King Electrical Appliances (Huizhou) Co. Ltd. answer due 3/21/2022; TCL MOKA International Limited answer due 3/21/2022; TCL Smart Device (Vietnam) Co. Ltd. answer due 3/21/2022; TCL Technology Group Corporation answer due 3/21/2022; TTE Technology, Inc. answer due 3/21/2022. Ordered by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 1/19/2022. (kmd)
|
| Case Assigned to Judge Colm F. Connolly. Please include the initials of the Judge (CFC) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by DivX, LLC. TTE Technology, Inc. served on 12/29/2021, answer due 1/19/2022. (Farnan, Brian) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued with Magistrate Consent Notice attached as to Shenzhen TCL New Technologies Co. Ltd. on 12/28/2021; TCL Electronics Holdings Limited on 12/28/2021; TCL King Electrical Appliances (Huizhou) Co. Ltd. on 12/28/2021; TCL MOKA International Limited on 12/28/2021; TCL Smart Device (Vietnam) Co. Ltd. on 12/28/2021; TCL Technology Group Corporation on 12/28/2021; TTE Technology, Inc. on 12/28/2021. (apk) |
| Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) US 8,472,792 B2. (apk) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (apk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT filed with Jury Demand against Shenzhen TCL New Technologies Co. Ltd., TCL Electronics Holdings Limited, TCL King Electrical Appliances (Huizhou) Co. Ltd., TCL MOKA International Limited, TCL Smart Device (Vietnam) Co. Ltd., TCL Technology Group Corporation, TTE Technology, Inc. - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ADEDC-3771233.) - filed by DivX, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(apk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
