Pineapple34, LLC v. Lenovo (United States) Inc.
| Pineapple34, LLC |
| Lenovo (United States) Inc. |
| 1:2022cv00059 |
| January 14, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Maryellen Noreika |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Lenovo (United States), Inc. to move, answer, or otherwise respond to the Complaint to April 27, 2022 - filed by Lenovo (United States) Inc.. (Smith, Rodger) |
SO ORDERED re #8 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Lenovo (United States), Inc. to move, answer, or otherwise respond to the Complaint to April 27, 2022 (Set/Reset Answer Deadlines: Lenovo (United States) Inc. answer due 4/27/2022). ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 3/14/2022. (dlw)
|
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Pineapple34, LLC. Lenovo (United States) Inc. served on 1/20/2022, answer due 3/28/2022. (deBruin, David) |
| Filing 6 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Lenovo (United States), Inc. to move, answer, or otherwise respond to the Complaint to March 28, 2022 - filed by Lenovo (United States) Inc.. (Smith, Rodger) |
|
SO ORDERED re #6 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Lenovo (United States), Inc. to move, answer, or otherwise respond to the Complaint to March 28, 2022 (Set/Reset Answer Deadlines: Lenovo (United States) Inc. answer due 3/28/2022). ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 1/24/2022. (dlw)
|
| Case Assigned to Judge Maryellen Noreika. Please include the initials of the Judge (MN) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued with Magistrate Consent Notice attached as to Lenovo (United States) Inc. on 1/14/2022. (apk) |
| Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Pineapple34, LLC. (apk) |
| Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 7,068,499 ;7,181,252. (apk) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (apk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT filed with Jury Demand against Lenovo (United States) Inc. - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ADEDC-3782041.) - filed by Pineapple34, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(apk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Pineapple34, LLC v. Lenovo (United States) Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Pineapple34, LLC | |
| Represented By: | David W. deBruin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Lenovo (United States) Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Jack B. Blumenfeld |
| Represented By: | Rodger Dallery Smith, II |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
