Snoddy v. Professional Directional Enterprises, Inc.
Plaintiff: Jim Snoddy
Defendant: Professional Directional Enterprises, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2022cv00096
Filed: January 25, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Delaware
Presiding Judge: Stephanos Bibas
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: DESIGNATION OF CIRCUIT JUDGE TO HOLD A DISTRICT COURT WITHIN THE CIRCUIT, designating and assigning the Honorable Stephanos Bibas of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. Signed by Judge Michael A Chagares, Chief Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit on 3/18/2022. (rjb)
March 18, 2022 Case Reassigned to Judge Stephanos Bibas, of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. Please include the initials of the Judge (SB) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb)
February 25, 2022 Pro Hac Vice Attorneys Andrew W. Dunlap, Carl Fitz, and Michael Josephson for Jim Snoddy added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (srs)
February 22, 2022 Filing 5 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Michael A. Josephson, Andrew W. Dunlap, and Carl Fitz - filed by Jim Snoddy. (Farnan, Michael)
February 22, 2022 Opinion or Order SO ORDERED, re #5 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Michael A. Josephson, Andrew W. Dunlap, and Carl Fitz filed by Jim Snoddy. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 2/22/22. (ntl)
February 16, 2022 Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jim Snoddy. Professional Directional Enterprises, Inc. served on 2/15/2022, answer due 3/8/2022. (Farnan, Michael)
February 2, 2022 Case Assigned to Judge Leonard P. Stark. Please include the initials of the Judge (LPS) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb)
January 25, 2022 Filing 3 Summons Issued with Magistrate Consent Notice attached as to Professional Directional Enterprises, Inc. on 1/25/2022. (mal)
January 25, 2022 Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (mal)
January 25, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed with Jury Demand against Professional Directional Enterprises, Inc. - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ADEDC-3788306.) - filed by Jim Snoddy. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(mal)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Snoddy v. Professional Directional Enterprises, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jim Snoddy
Represented By: Sue L. Robinson
Represented By: Brian E. Farnan
Represented By: Michael J. Farnan
Represented By: Andrew W. Dunlap
Represented By: Carl Fitz
Represented By: Michael Josephson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Professional Directional Enterprises, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?