VideoLabs, Inc. et al v. Netflix Inc.
| VideoLabs, Inc. and VL Collective IP LLC |
| Netflix Inc. |
| 1:2022cv00229 |
| February 23, 2022 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Colm F Connolly |
| Joel H Slomsky |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 14, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 29
ORDER, A hearing on the Motion (D.I. #15 ) is RESCHEDULED to take place on February 9, 2023 at 3:00 p.m. in Courtroom 13A, United States Courthouse, 601 Market Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. (A Motion Hearing is set for 2/9/2023 at 03:00 PM in Philadelphia before Judge Joel H Slomsky) Signed by Judge Joel H Slomsky on 1/11/2023. (apk)
|
|
Pro Hac Vice Attorney Aliza George Carrano for Netflix Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (smg)
|
|
Filing 28
NOTICE of Change of Address by Brian E. Farnan (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Pro Hac Vice Attorney Courtland L. Reichman for VL Collective IP LLC added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (mpb)
|
|
Filing 27
Order Granting D.I. #25 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Aliza George Carrano filed by Netflix Inc. Signed by Judge Joel H Slomsky on 12/05/2022. (smg)
|
|
Filing 26
OORDER Setting Hearing on Motion #15 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim : ( A Motion Hearing is set for 2/2/2023 at 11:00 AM in Philadelphia before Judge Joel H Slomsky). Signed by Judge Joel H Slomsky on 12/05/2022. (smg)
|
|
Filing 25
MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Aliza George Carrano - filed by Netflix Inc.. (Ying, Jennifer)
|
|
Filing 24
ORDER, A hearing on the Motion to Dismiss will be held on December 16, 2022 at 3:00 p.m. in Courtroom 13A, United States Courthouse, 601 Market Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.( A Motion Hearing is set for 12/16/2022 at 03:00 PM in Philadelphia before Judge Joel H Slomsky) Signed by Judge Joel H Slomsky on 11/16/2022. (apk)
|
|
Filing 23
ORDER: DESIGNATION OF DISTRICT JUDGE TO HOLD A DISTRICT COURT WITHIN THE CIRCUIT, designating and assigning the Honorable Joel H. Slomsky of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Signed by Judge Michael A Chagares, Chief Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit on 11/8/2022. (rjb)
|
|
Case Reassigned to Judge Joel H Slomsky of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Please include the initials of the Judge (JHS) after the case number on all documents filed. Associated Cases: 1:22-cv-00229-JHS, 1:22-cv-00680-JHS (rjb)
|
|
Filing 22
Letter to The Honorable Colm F. Connolly from Brian E. Farnan regarding Response to October 18, 2022 Oral Order - re Oral Order,,,. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Pro Hac Vice Attorney Gabrielle K. Antonello, Christopher Hong, Stephen A. Marshall, and Indranil Mukerji for Netflix Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (mpb)
|
|
ORAL ORDER: It is HEREBY ORDERED that on or before November 1, 2022, the parties shall either (1) submit to the Clerk of Court an executed Form AO 85 Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge, indicating their consent to have a United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case including trial, the entry of final judgment, and post-trial proceedings; or (2) file a joint letter indicating that all the parties do not consent to a referral of this action to a Magistrate Judge. The letter should not indicate which party or parties did not consent. If all the parties consent, the case will be referred to Magistrate Judge Hall. Because of the Court's caseload, if the parties do not consent, the Court intends to assign the case to a visiting judge from another district. Ordered by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 10/18/2022. (nmf)
|
|
Pro Hac Vice Attorney Stephen A. Marshall for Netflix Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (mpb)
|
|
Filing 21
Amended Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: identifying Corporate Parent VL IP Holdings LLC, Other Affiliate VideoLabs, Inc. for VL Collective IP LLC filed by VL Collective IP LLC, VideoLabs, Inc.. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 20
NOTICE requesting Clerk to remove Linda Chang as co-counsel. Reason for request: No longer with firm. (Ying, Jennifer)
|
|
Filing 19
REPLY BRIEF re #15 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Netflix Inc.. (Ying, Jennifer)
|
|
Filing 18
ANSWERING BRIEF in Opposition re #15 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by VL Collective IP LLC, VideoLabs, Inc..Reply Brief due date per Local Rules is 7/1/2022. (Farnan, Michael)
|
|
Filing 17
Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Netflix Inc.. (Ying, Jennifer)
|
|
Filing 16
OPENING BRIEF in Support re #15 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Netflix Inc..Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 6/24/2022. (Ying, Jennifer)
|
|
Filing 15
MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim - filed by Netflix Inc.. (Ying, Jennifer)
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #14 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Indranil Mukerji, Stephen A. Marshall, Linda Chang, Christopher Hong and Gabrielle K. Antonello, filed by Netflix Inc. Ordered by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 6/8/2022. (kmd)
|
|
Filing 14
MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Indranil Mukerji, Stephen A. Marshall, Linda Chang, Christopher Hong and Gabrielle K. Antonello - filed by Netflix Inc.. (Ying, Jennifer)
|
|
Pro Hac Vice Attorney Michael J.X. Matulewicz-Crowley for VL Collective IP LLC added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (mpb)
|
|
Filing 13
MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Michael Matulewicz-Crowley - filed by VL Collective IP LLC, VideoLabs, Inc.. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #13 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Michael Matulewicz-Crowley, filed by VL Collective IP LLC, VideoLabs, Inc. Ordered by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 6/3/2022. (kmd)
|
|
Filing 12
Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) US 8,139,878 B2 ;US 7,440,559 B2 ;US 7,233,790 B2 ;US 8,605,794 B2 . (Farnan, Michael)
|
|
Filing 11
First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Netflix Inc.- filed by VideoLabs, Inc., VL Collective IP LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit 14, #15 Exhibit 15, #16 Exhibit 16, #17 Exhibit 17, #18 Exhibit 18, #19 Exhibit 19, #20 Exhibit 20, #21 Exhibit 21, #22 Exhibit 22, #23 Exhibit 23, #24 Exhibit 24, #25 Exhibit 25, #26 Exhibit 26, #27 Exhibit 27, #28 Exhibit 28, #29 Exhibit 29, #30 Exhibit 30, #31 Exhibit 31, #32 Exhibit 32, #33 Exhibit 33, #34 Exhibit 34, #35 Exhibit 35, #36 Exhibit 36, #37 Exhibit 37, #38 Exhibit 38, #39 Exhibit 39, #40 Exhibit 40, #41 Exhibit 41, #42 Exhibit 42, #43 Exhibit 43, #44 Exhibit 44, #45 Exhibit 45, #46 Exhibit 46, #47 Exhibit 47, #48 Exhibit 48, #49 Exhibit 49, #50 Exhibit 50, #51 Exhibit 51, #52 Exhibit 52, #53 Exhibit 53, #54 Exhibit 54, #55 Exhibit 55, #56 Exhibit 56, #57 Exhibit 57, #58 Exhibit 58, #59 Exhibit 59, #60 Exhibit 60, #61 Exhibit 61, #62 Exhibit 62, #63 Exhibit 63, #64 Exhibit 64, #65 Exhibit 65, #66 Exhibit 66, #67 Exhibit 67, #68 Exhibit 68, #69 Exhibit 69, #70 Exhibit 70, #71 Exhibit 71, #72 Exhibit 72, #73 Exhibit 73, #74 Exhibit 74, #75 Exhibit 75, #76 Exhibit 76, #77 Exhibit 77, #78 Exhibit 78, #79 Exhibit 79, #80 Exhibit 80, #81 Exhibit 81, #82 Exhibit 82, #83 Exhibit 83, #84 Exhibit 84, #85 Exhibit 85)(Farnan, Michael)
|
|
Filing 10
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendant Netflix Inc. to move, answer, or otherwise respond to the Complaint, including any amended complaint filed by 5/6/2022 to 6/10/2022 - filed by VL Collective IP LLC, VideoLabs, Inc.. (Farnan, Michael)
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #10 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendant Netflix Inc. to move, answer, or otherwise respond to the Complaint, including any amended complaint filed by 5/6/2022 to 6/10/2022, filed by VL Collective IP LLC, VideoLabs, Inc. Reset Answer Deadlines: Netflix Inc. answer due 6/10/2022. Ordered by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 4/29/2022. (kmd)
|
|
Filing 9
MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Courtland L. Reichman, Christine E. Lehman, Wesley L. White, Jaime F.Cardenas-Navia, and Taylor Mauze - filed by VL Collective IP LLC, VideoLabs, Inc.. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #9 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Courtland L. Reichman, Christine E. Lehman, Wesley L. White, Jaime F.Cardenas-Navia, and Taylor Mauze, filed by VL Collective IP LLC, VideoLabs, Inc. Ordered by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 4/22/2022. (kmd)
|
|
Pro Hac Vice Attorney Jaime F Cardenas-Navia, Christine E. Lehman, Taylor Mauze, and Wesley L. White for VL Collective IP LLC added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (mpb)
|
|
Filing 8
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendant Netflix Inc. to move, answer, or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs VideoLabs, Inc. and VL Collective IP LLC's Complaint (D.I. 1) to April 29, 2022 - filed by Netflix Inc.. (Ying, Jennifer)
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #8 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendant Netflix Inc. to move, answer, or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs VideoLabs, Inc. and VL Collective IP LLC's Complaint (D.I. 1) to April 29, 2022, filed by Netflix Inc.Reset Answer Deadlines: Netflix Inc. answer due 4/29/2022. Ordered by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 4/7/2022. (kmd)
|
|
Filing 7
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendant Netflix Inc. to move, answer, or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs VideoLabs, Inc. and VL Collective IP LLC's Complaint (D.I. 1) to April 18, 2022 - filed by Netflix Inc.. (Ying, Jennifer)
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #7 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendant Netflix Inc. to move, answer, or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs VideoLabs, Inc. and VL Collective IP LLC's Complaint (D.I. 1) to April 18, 2022, filed by Netflix Inc. Reset Answer Deadlines: Netflix Inc. answer due 4/18/2022. Ordered by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 3/15/2022. (kmd)
|
|
Case Assigned to Judge Colm F. Connolly. Please include the initials of the Judge (CFC) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb)
|
|
Filing 6
Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: identifying Corporate Parent VL IP Holdings LLC for VL Collective IP LLC filed by VL Collective IP LLC, VideoLabs, Inc.. (Farnan, Michael)
|
|
Filing 5
SUMMONS Returned Executed by VideoLabs, Inc., VL Collective IP LLC. Netflix Inc. served on 2/24/2022, answer due 3/17/2022. (Farnan, Michael)
|
|
Filing 4
Summons Issued with Magistrate Consent Notice attached as to Netflix Inc. on 2/24/2022. (twk)
|
|
Filing 3
Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) US 8,139,878 B2; US 7,440,559 B2; US 7,233,790 B2. (twk)
|
|
Filing 2
Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (twk)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT filed with Jury Demand against Netflix Inc. - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ADEDC-3809675.) - filed by VideoLabs, Inc., VL Collective IP LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit 14, #15 Exhibit 15, #16 Exhibit 16, #17 Exhibit 17, #18 Exhibit 18, #19 Exhibit 19, #20 Exhibit 20, #21 Exhibit 21, #22 Exhibit 22, #23 Exhibit 23, #24 Exhibit 24, #25 Exhibit 25, #26 Exhibit 26, #27 Exhibit 27, #28 Exhibit 28, #29 Exhibit 29, #30 Exhibit 30, #31 Exhibit 31, #32 Exhibit 32, #33 Exhibit 33, #34 Exhibit 34, #35 Exhibit 35, #36 Exhibit 36, #37 Exhibit 37, #38 Exhibit 38, #39 Exhibit 39, #40 Exhibit 40, #41 Exhibit 41, #42 Exhibit 42, #43 Exhibit 43, #44 Exhibit 44, #45 Exhibit 45, #46 Exhibit 46, #47 Exhibit 47, #48 Exhibit 48, #49 Exhibit 49, #50 Exhibit 50, #51 Exhibit 51, #52 Exhibit 52, #53 Exhibit 53, #54 Exhibit 54, #55 Exhibit 55, #56 Exhibit 56, #57 Exhibit 57, #58 Exhibit 58, #59 Exhibit 59, #60 Exhibit 60, #61 Exhibit 61, #62 Exhibit 62, #63 Exhibit 63, #64 Exhibit 64, #65 Civil Cover Sheet)(twk)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
