Arbor Pharmaceuticals, LLC et al v. Saba Ilac Sanayi ve Ticaret AS
Plaintiff: Arbor Pharmaceuticals, LLC and Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited
Defendant: Saba Ilac Sanayi ve Ticaret AS
Case Number: 1:2022cv00353
Filed: March 18, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Delaware
Presiding Judge: Maryellen Noreika
Nature of Suit: Patent - Abbreviated New Drug Application(ANDA)
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 28, 2022 Filing 13 NOTICE requesting Clerk to remove Angela C. Whitesell as co-counsel.. (Silver, Daniel)
April 22, 2022 Pro Hac Vice Attorney Brent A. Batzer, Shashank D. Upadhye, and Yixin H. Tang for Saba Ilac Sanayi ve Ticaret AS added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (mpb)
April 13, 2022 Filing 12 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendant to answer or otherwise plead in response to Complaint to June, 21, 2022 by Saba Ilac Sanayi ve Ticaret AS. (Green, James) Modified on 4/13/2022 (dlw).
April 13, 2022 Filing 11 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Yixin Tang - filed by Saba Ilac Sanayi ve Ticaret AS. (Green, James)
April 13, 2022 Filing 10 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Shashank Upadhye - filed by Saba Ilac Sanayi ve Ticaret AS. (Green, James) (Main Document 10 replaced on 4/13/2022) (dlw).
April 13, 2022 Filing 9 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Brent Batzer - filed by Saba Ilac Sanayi ve Ticaret AS. (Green, James)
April 13, 2022 Opinion or Order SO ORDERED re #9 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Brent Batzer, #11 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Yixin Tang, #10 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Shashank Upadhye filed by Saba Ilac Sanayi ve Ticaret AS. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 4/13/2022. (dlw)
April 13, 2022 Opinion or Order SO ORDERED re #12 Stipulation to Extend Time for Defendant to answer or otherwise pleading in response to Complaint (Set/Reset Answer Deadlines: Saba Ilac Sanayi ve Ticaret AS answer due 6/21/2022). ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 4/13/2022. (dlw)
April 13, 2022 CORRECTING ENTRY: D.I. 10 has been replaced on the docket. The motion now contains the attorneys' /s/ signature. (dlw)
April 12, 2022 Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Arbor Pharmaceuticals, LLC, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited: For Saba Ilac Sanayi ve Ticaret AS waiver sent on 4/7/2022, answer due 6/6/2022. (Silver, Daniel)
March 23, 2022 Case Assigned to Judge Maryellen Noreika. Please include the initials of the Judge (MN) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb)
March 21, 2022 Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Saba Ilac Sanayi ve Ticaret AS on 3/21/2022. (mal)
March 18, 2022 Filing 6 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: identifying Corporate Parent Azurity Pharmaceuticals, Inc. for Arbor Pharmaceuticals, LLC filed by Arbor Pharmaceuticals, LLC. (mal)
March 18, 2022 Filing 5 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: identifying Other Affiliate The Master Trust Bank of Japan, Ltd. for Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited filed by Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited. (mal)
March 18, 2022 Filing 4 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 7,157,584 ;7,572,920 ;9,066,936. (mal)
March 18, 2022 Filing 3 Supplemental information for patent cases involving an Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) - Date Patentee(s) Received Notice: No earlier than February 2, 2022. Date of Expiration of Patent: 7,157,584 (May 22, 2025) 7,572,920 (January 7, 2025) 9,066,936 (March 26, 2028).Thirty Month Stay Deadline: No earlier than August 2, 2024.(mal)
March 18, 2022 Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (mal)
March 18, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed against Saba Ilac Sanayi ve Ticaret AS - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ADEDC-3828662.) - filed by Arbor Pharmaceuticals, LLC, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-C, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(mal)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Arbor Pharmaceuticals, LLC et al v. Saba Ilac Sanayi ve Ticaret AS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Arbor Pharmaceuticals, LLC
Represented By: Daniel M. Silver
Represented By: Alexandra M. Joyce
Represented By: Angela Whitesell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited
Represented By: Daniel M. Silver
Represented By: Alexandra M. Joyce
Represented By: Angela Whitesell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Saba Ilac Sanayi ve Ticaret AS
Represented By: Brent A. Batzer
Represented By: James S. Green, Jr.
Represented By: Shashank D. Upadhye
Represented By: Yixin H. Tang
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?