Deutsche Telekom AG v. iPass Inc.
| Deutsche Telekom AG |
| iPass Inc. |
| 1:2022cv00370 |
| March 23, 2022 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Maryellen Noreika |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CASE CLOSED (dlw) |
Filing 10
ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is STAYED pursuant to the provisions of 11 U.S.C. 362 and ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED until further Order of the Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall promptly notify the Court when the bankruptcy proceedings have been resolved so that the cases may be reopened and other appropriate action may be taken. Signed by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 7/25/2022. (dlw)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Defendant iPass Inc.'s Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Proceedings by Deutsche Telekom AG (Barillare, Jody) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Withdrawal of Deutsche Telekom AG's Request for Clerk's Entry of Default Against IPass, Inc. by Deutsche Telekom AG re #5 REQUEST for Default as to iPass Inc. (Barillare, Jody) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF SERVICE of Request for Default (D.I. 5) re 6 Oral Order, #5 REQUEST for Default as to iPass Inc. filed by Deutsche Telekom AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Barillare, Jody) |
|
Filing 6
ORAL ORDER re #5 REQUEST for Default as to iPass Inc. - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff shall serve a copy of the Request for Default on Defendant and shall file proof of service regarding same. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 6/23/2022. (dlw)
|
| Filing 5 REQUEST for Default as to iPass Inc. - filed by Deutsche Telekom AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Barillare, Jody) |
| Filing 4 Return of Service Executed by Deutsche Telekom AG. iPass Inc. served on 4/1/2022, answer due 4/22/2022. (Barillare, Jody) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Maryellen Noreika. Please include the initials of the Judge (MN) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
| Filing 3 Proposed Final Judgment - filed by Deutsche Telekom AG. (srs) Modified on 3/31/2022 (dlw). |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (srs) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Seeking Recognition of Foreign-Country Judgment filed against iPass Inc. - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ADEDC-3831510.) - filed by Deutsche Telekom AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(srs) |
| No Summons Issued. (srs) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Deutsche Telekom AG v. iPass Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Deutsche Telekom AG | |
| Represented By: | Jody Barillare |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: iPass Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
