Dialog Semiconductor B.V. v. Heritage IP LLC
| Dialog Semiconductor B.V. |
| Heritage IP LLC |
| 1:2022cv00455 |
| April 6, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Vacant Judgeship (2022) |
| Christopher J Burke |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. § 1 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number US 6,854,067 B1. (etg) |
Filing 17
SO ORDERED, re #16 Stipulation of Dismissal filed by Dialog Semiconductor B.V. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 5/24/2022.***Civil Case Terminated. (etg)
|
| Filing 16 STIPULATION of Dismissal (Joint) by Dialog Semiconductor B.V.. (Palapura, Bindu) |
|
SO ORDERED D.I. #15 MOTION to Stay All Deadlines and Notice of Settlement to 06/06/2022 filed by Heritage IP LLC. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 5/6/2022. (dlb)
|
| Filing 15 MOTION to Stay All Deadlines and Notice of Settlement to 06/06/2022 - filed by Heritage IP LLC. (Chong, Jimmy) |
| Filing 14 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for parties to hold Rule 26(f) Conference to 05/10/2022 - filed by Heritage IP LLC. (Chong, Jimmy) |
|
SO ORDERED D.I. #14 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for parties to hold Rule 26(f) Conference to 05/10/2022 filed by Heritage IP LLC. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 5/4/2022. (dlb)
|
|
Filing 13
ORAL ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties shall meet and confer and discuss, in person and/or by telephone, each of the matters listed on Judge Burke's Case Management Checklist (Checklist). At the time called for by Standing Order No. 2022-VAC-1, the parties shall jointly file the following: (i) a copy of the Checklist, indicating the names of Lead Counsel and Delaware Counsel for each party; (ii) a proposed Scheduling Order, which is consistent with Judge Burke's "Rule 16 Scheduling Order - Patent"; and (iii) a letter, not to exceed three pages, that contains the following: (a) a description of what this case is about; (b) the parties' positions regarding any disputes in the proposed Scheduling Order, and (c) a list of the three most significant topics (other than Scheduling Order disputes) discussed during the parties review of the Checklist items, along with a brief description as to what was discussed as to those topics. The proposed Scheduling Order shall not contain dates for motions hearings or for a pretrial conference or trial. Thereafter, the Court may schedule a Case Management Conference/Rule 16 Scheduling Conference to be held with Judge Burke. The Checklist and Scheduling Order can be found on Judge Burke's portion of the District Court's website. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 4/26/2022. (dlb)
|
| REMARK: The parties should be aware that the Court encourages the participation of newer attorneys in courtroom proceedings and at oral argument. Please see the Court's Standing Order Regarding Courtroom Opportunities for Newer Attorneys, a link to which is provided here for the parties' convenience:#http://www.ded.uscourts.gov/sites/ded/files/forms/StandingOrder2017.pdf (dlb) |
| Remark: The parties should follow the Court's Standing Order Regarding Courtesy Copies, a copy of which is found on Judge Burke's portion of the District Court's webpage: #CJB Standing Order re Copies (dlb) |
| Filing 12 ORAL ORDER: The parties having filed the appropriate form advising the Court that they do not unanimously consent to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, until further order of the Court, this case will remain assigned to the VAC (2022) docket. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is referred to Magistrate Judge Christopher J. Burke solely for the following purposes: (1) to adjudicate discovery (including fact and expert discovery) and protective order disputes; (2) to issue or modify a scheduling order; (3) to review stipulated orders and pro hac vice motions; and (4) to review requests for mediation in cases other than patent and securities cases. Issued by the Clerk of Court on 4/19/22. (etg) |
| Filing 11 VAC Magistrate Non-Consent completed by the parties filed by Dialog Semiconductor B.V.. (Moore, David) |
| Filing 10 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to Answer the Complaint to 05/27/2022 - filed by Heritage IP LLC. (Chong, Jimmy) |
|
SO ORDERED, re #10 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to Answer the Complaint to 05/27/2022 - filed by Heritage IP LLC. Reset Answer Deadlines: Heritage IP LLC answer due 5/27/2022. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 4/19/2022. (etg)
|
| Filing 9 VAC Notice, Consent, Non-Consent, Magistrate Referral (etg) |
| Filing 8 ORAL ORDER: This case has been assigned to the District of Delaware's Vacant Judgeship ("VAC"). Detailed information relating to VAC cases may be found in the Court's Announcement of March 3, 2022 and Standing Order No. 2022-VAC-1 (March 9, 2022), which are found on the Court's website. Consistent with the foregoing Announcement and Standing Order, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties shall file the "Notice of Consent or Absence of Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge," being docketed along with the instant order, no later than sixty (60) days after service of the Complaint on the first defendant that is served. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Notice, Consent, and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction, previously docketed in this case, are VACATED. Issued by the Clerk of Court on 4/13/2022. (etg) |
| Case Assigned to Vacant Judgeship (2022). Please include initials of VAC after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
|
SO ORDERED, re #6 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Marc J. Pernick, Jason A. Crotty, and Jason R. Bartlett of Mauriel Kapouytian Woods LLP filed by Dialog Semiconductor B.V. Ordered by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 4/13/2022. (etg)
|
| Pro Hac Vice Attorney Jason R. Bartlett, Jason A. Crotty, and Marc J. Pernick for Dialog Semiconductor B.V. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (mpb) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Dialog Semiconductor B.V.. Heritage IP LLC served on 4/6/2022, answer due 4/27/2022. (Moore, David) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Marc J. Pernick, Jason A. Crotty, and Jason R. Bartlett of Mauriel Kapouytian Woods LLP - filed by Dialog Semiconductor B.V.. (Palapura, Bindu) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Heritage IP LLC on 4/6/2022. (apk) |
| Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: identifying Corporate Parent Renesas Electronics Corporation, Corporate Parent INCJ, Ltd. for Dialog Semiconductor B.V. filed by Dialog Semiconductor B.V. (apk) |
| Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) US 6,854,067 B1. (apk) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (apk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed with Jury Demand against Heritage IP LLC - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ADEDC-3844262.) - filed by Dialog Semiconductor B.V.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-H, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(apk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
