Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. et al v. Mylan Laboratories Limited et al
Plaintiff: Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. and H. Lundbeck A/S
Defendant: Mylan Laboratories Limited, Viatris Inc. and Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Case Number: 1:2022cv00464
Filed: April 8, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Delaware
Presiding Judge: Colm F Connolly
Nature of Suit: Patent - Abbreviated New Drug Application(ANDA)
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 2, 2022 Filing 12 NOTICE of Withdrawal of Appearance by Mylan Laboratories Limited, Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc., Viatris Inc. of Ian R. Liston (Liston, Ian)
June 2, 2022 Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Christine Dealy Haynes on behalf of Mylan Laboratories Limited, Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc., Viatris Inc. (Haynes, Christine)
June 2, 2022 Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Frederick L. Cottrell, III on behalf of Mylan Laboratories Limited, Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc., Viatris Inc. (Cottrell, Frederick)
May 11, 2022 Opinion or Order SO ORDERED, re #9 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to Answer, Move or Otherwise Respond to Complaint to June 10, 2022, filed by Viatris Inc., Mylan Laboratories Limited, Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. Reset Answer Deadlines: Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. answer due 6/10/2022; Viatris Inc. answer due 6/10/2022. Ordered by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 5/11/2022. (kmd)
May 11, 2022 CORRECTING ENTRY: Party text for DI #9 has been modified per counsel's request. (mpb)
May 10, 2022 Filing 9 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to Answer, Move or Otherwise Respond to Complaint to June 10, 2022 - filed by Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc., Viatris Inc.. (Liston, Ian) Modified on 5/11/2022 (mpb).
April 20, 2022 Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., H. Lundbeck A/S. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. served on 4/20/2022, answer due 5/11/2022. (Mayo, Andrew)
April 20, 2022 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., H. Lundbeck A/S. Viatris Inc. served on 4/20/2022, answer due 5/11/2022. (Mayo, Andrew)
April 13, 2022 Case Assigned to Judge Colm F. Connolly. Please include the initials of the Judge (CFC) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb)
April 8, 2022 Filing 6 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by H. Lundbeck A/S. (mal)
April 8, 2022 Filing 5 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: identifying Corporate Parent Otsuka Holdings Co., Ltd. for Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. filed by Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.. (mal)
April 8, 2022 Filing 4 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) see attached. (mal)
April 8, 2022 Filing 3 Supplemental information for patent cases involving an Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) - Date Patentee(s) Received Notice: 02/24/2022. Date of Expiration of Patent: see attached.Thirty Month Stay Deadline: 8/24/2024. (mal)
April 8, 2022 Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (mal)
April 8, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT - filed against Mylan Laboratories Limited, Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc., Viatris Inc. - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ADEDC-3847462.) - filed by Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., H. Lundbeck A/S. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-M, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(mal)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. et al v. Mylan Laboratories Limited et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
Represented By: Steven J. Balick
Represented By: Andrew Colin Mayo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: H. Lundbeck A/S
Represented By: Steven J. Balick
Represented By: Andrew Colin Mayo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mylan Laboratories Limited
Represented By: Frederick L. Cottrell, III
Represented By: Christine Dealy Haynes
Represented By: Ian Robert Liston
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Viatris Inc.
Represented By: Frederick L. Cottrell, III
Represented By: Christine Dealy Haynes
Represented By: Ian Robert Liston
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Represented By: Frederick L. Cottrell, III
Represented By: Christine Dealy Haynes
Represented By: Ian Robert Liston
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?