Bickleman v. Lewes Rehoboth Lodge No. 646 et al
Debra Bickleman |
Lewes Rehoboth Lodge No. 646, Loyal Order of Moose, Inc. and Moose International, Incorporated |
1:2022cv00515 |
April 22, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Delaware |
Maryellen Noreika |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Civil Complaint and Summons served on Moose International, Incorporated c/o C.T. Corporation System on 05/05/2022, filed by Debra Bickleman. (Brown, Amy) |
Case Assigned to Judge Maryellen Noreika. Please include the initials of the Judge (MN) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
Filing 3 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Civil Complaint and Summons served on Lewes Rehoboth Lodge No. 646, Loyal Order of Moose, Inc., c/o The Corporation Trust Company on 04/25/2022, filed by Debra Bickleman. (Brown, Amy) |
Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (srs) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed against Lewes Rehoboth Lodge No. 646, Loyal Order of Moose, Inc., Moose International, Incorporated - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ADEDC-3857575.) - filed by Debra Bickleman. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(srs) |
No Summons Issued. (srs) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.