DataQuill Limited v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: DataQuill Limited
Defendant: Amazon.com, Inc., Amazon Digital Services LLC and Amazon.com Services LLC
Case Number: 1:2022cv00610
Filed: May 6, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Delaware
Presiding Judge: Maryellen Noreika
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 30, 2022 Filing 9 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Amazon Digital Services LLC, Amazon.com Services LLC, Amazon.com, Inc.- filed by DataQuill Limited. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F)(Farnan, Michael)
June 28, 2022 Filing 8 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for (1) Defendants to answer, move or otherwise respond to the Complaint (D.I. 1) ; (2) Plaintiff may amend the complaint; and (3) Defendants shall have 21 days to respond to the amended complaint to July 7, 2022 and June 30, 2022, respectively - filed by Amazon Digital Services LLC, Amazon.com Services LLC, Amazon.com, Inc.. (Flynn, Michael)
June 28, 2022 Opinion or Order SO ORDERED re #8 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for (1) Defendants to answer, move or otherwise respond to the Complaint (D.I. 1); (2) Plaintiff may amend the complaint; and (3) Defendants shall have 21 days to respond to the amended complaint (Set/Reset Answer Deadlines: Amazon Digital Services LLC answer due 7/7/2022; Amazon.com Services LLC answer due 7/7/2022; Amazon.com, Inc. answer due 7/7/2022). ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 6/28/2022. (dlw)
June 3, 2022 Opinion or Order SO ORDERED, re #7 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Christina V. Rayburn and Moez M. Kaba filed by Amazon.com Services LLC, Amazon.com, Inc., Amazon Digital Services LLC. Ordered by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 6/3/2022. (asw)
June 2, 2022 Filing 7 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Christina V. Rayburn and Moez M. Kaba - filed by Amazon Digital Services LLC, Amazon.com Services LLC, Amazon.com, Inc.. (Flynn, Michael)
May 25, 2022 Filing 6 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to answer, move or otherwise respond to the Complaint to June 30, 2022 - filed by Amazon Digital Services LLC, Amazon.com Services LLC, Amazon.com, Inc.. (Flynn, Michael)
May 25, 2022 Opinion or Order SO ORDERED re #6 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to answer, move or otherwise respond to the Complaint to June 30, 2022 (Set/Reset Answer Deadlines: Amazon Digital Services LLC answer due 6/30/2022; Amazon.com Services LLC answer due 6/30/2022; Amazon.com, Inc. answer due 6/30/2022). ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 5/25/2022. (dlw)
May 11, 2022 Case Assigned to Judge Maryellen Noreika. Please include the initials of the Judge (MN) after the case number on all documents filed. (nms)
May 10, 2022 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by DataQuill Limited. Amazon Digital Services LLC served on 5/9/2022, answer due 5/31/2022; Amazon.com Services LLC served on 5/9/2022, answer due 5/31/2022; Amazon.com, Inc. served on 5/9/2022, answer due 5/31/2022. (Farnan, Michael)
May 6, 2022 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Amazon Digital Services LLC on 5/6/2022; Amazon.com Services LLC on 5/6/2022; Amazon.com, Inc. on 5/6/2022. (Attachments: #1 Summons Issued Amazon.com, Inc., #2 Summons Issued Amazon Digital Services LLC)(smg)
May 6, 2022 Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number US 6,058,304. (smg)
May 6, 2022 Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (smg)
May 6, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed with Jury Demand against Amazon Digital Services LLC, Amazon.com Services LLC, Amazon.com, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ADEDC-3868446.) - filed by DataQuill Limited. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(smg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: DataQuill Limited v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DataQuill Limited
Represented By: Brian E. Farnan
Represented By: Michael J. Farnan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Amazon.com, Inc.
Represented By: Michael J. Flynn
Represented By: Christina V. Rayburn
Represented By: Moez M. Kaba
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Amazon Digital Services LLC
Represented By: Michael J. Flynn
Represented By: Christina V. Rayburn
Represented By: Moez M. Kaba
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Amazon.com Services LLC
Represented By: Michael J. Flynn
Represented By: Christina V. Rayburn
Represented By: Moez M. Kaba
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?