Quantum Technology Innovations, LLC v. Popcornflix.com LLC et al
Quantum Technology Innovations, LLC |
Popcornflix.com LLC, Crackle Plus, LLC, Screen Media Ventures, LLC and Chicken Soup for the Soul Entertainment INC. |
1:2022cv00666 |
May 23, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Delaware |
Richard G Andrews |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
SO ORDERED, re #14 MOTION and Proposed Order to Extend Time (*Reset Answer Deadlines: Chicken Soup for the Soul Entertainment INC. answer due 9/12/2022; Crackle Plus, LLC answer due 9/12/2022; Popcornflix.com LLC answer due 9/12/2022; Screen Media Ventures, LLC answer due 9/12/2022). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 7/8/2022. (nms) |
Filing 14 MOTION and Proposed Order to Extend Time - filed by Quantum Technology Innovations, LLC. (Phillips, John) Modified on 7/7/2022 (nms). |
Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Quantum Technology Innovations, LLC. Chicken Soup for the Soul Entertainment INC. served on 6/22/2022, answer due 7/13/2022. (Phillips, John) |
Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Quantum Technology Innovations, LLC. Crackle Plus, LLC served on 6/22/2022, answer due 7/13/2022. (Phillips, John) |
Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Quantum Technology Innovations, LLC. Screen Media Ventures, LLC served on 6/22/2022, answer due 7/13/2022. (Phillips, John) |
Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Quantum Technology Innovations, LLC. Popcornflix.com LLC served on 6/22/2022, answer due 7/13/2022. (Phillips, John) |
Filing 9 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Shea N. Palavan - filed by Quantum Technology Innovations, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Certification of Shea N. Palavan)(Bilson, David) |
Case Assigned to Judge Richard G. Andrews. Please include the initials of the Judge (RGA) after the case number on all documents filed. (nms) |
Pro Hac Vice Attorney Shea N. Palavan for Quantum Technology Innovations, LLC added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (mpb) |
SO ORDERED, re #9 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Shea N. Palavan, filed by Quantum Technology Innovations, LLC. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 5/25/2022. (nms) |
Filing 8 Summons Issued as to Screen Media Ventures, LLC on 5/23/2022. (mpb) |
Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Popcornflix.com LLC on 5/23/2022. (mpb) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Crackle Plus, LLC on 5/23/2022. (mpb) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Chicken Soup for the Soul Entertainment INC. on 5/23/2022. (mpb) |
Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Quantum Technology Innovations, LLC. (mpb) |
Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 7,650,376. (mpb) |
Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (mpb) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for PATENT INFRINGEMENT filed with Jury Demand against Chicken Soup for the Soul Entertainment INC., Crackle Plus, LLC, Popcornflix.com LLC, Screen Media Ventures, LLC ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ADEDC-3879521.) - filed by Quantum Technology Innovations, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(mpb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.