Ford v. Keystone Human Services
| Sinphone L. Ford |
| Keystone Human Services |
| 1:2022cv00682 |
| May 25, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Vacant Judgeship (2022) |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Keystone Human Services. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(McMackin, James) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim - filed by Keystone Human Services. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Certificate of Service)(McMackin, James) |
SO ORDERED, re #6 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Kelley E. Kaufman, Esq. - filed by Keystone Human Services. Ordered by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 6/21/2022. (etg)
|
| Pro Hac Vice Attorney Kelley E. Kaufman for Keystone Human Services added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (mpb) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Kelley E. Kaufman, Esq. - filed by Keystone Human Services. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Certification of Counsel, #3 Certificate of Service)(McMackin, James) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by James H. McMackin, III on behalf of Keystone Human Services (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(McMackin, James) |
| Case Assigned to Vacant Judgeship (2022). Please include initials of VAC after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
| Filing 4 Corrections to D.I. #1 Complaint (page 2) and D.I. #1 -1 Exhibit (page 1), by Sinphone L. Ford. (smg) |
| Filing 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT for Magistrate Consent Forms. Acknowledgment filed by Sinphone L. Ford. (smg) |
| Summons Issued as to Keystone Human Services on 5/25/2022. (smg) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (srs) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed Pro Se with Jury Demand against Keystone Human Services ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number DEX037547.) - filed by Sinphone L. Ford. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Notice of Right to Sue, #3 Acknowledgement of Rule 4, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(srs) |
| Remark: Acknowledgment of Receipt for AO Form 85 and AO Form 85A mailed to pro se plaintiff. (srs) |
| Remark: Magistrate Consent Notice with one signature received and sent to case jacket. (srs) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ford v. Keystone Human Services | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Sinphone L. Ford | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Keystone Human Services | |
| Represented By: | James H. McMackin, III |
| Represented By: | Kelley E. Kaufman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
