Valyrian IP LLC v. Consolidated Communications Inc.
| Valyrian IP LLC |
| Consolidated Communications Inc. |
| 1:2022cv00699 |
| May 27, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Vacant Judgeship (2022) |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Valyrian IP LLC. Consolidated Communications Inc. served on 6/2/2022, answer due 6/23/2022. (Chong, Jimmy) |
| Filing 7 VAC Notice, Consent, Non-Consent, Magistrate Referral Associated Cases: 1:22-cv-00698-VAC, 1:22-cv-00699-VAC, 1:22-cv-00700-VAC(etg) |
| Filing 6 ORAL ORDER: This case has been assigned to the District of Delaware's Vacant Judgeship ("VAC"). Detailed information relating to VAC cases may be found in the Court's Announcement of March 3, 2022 and Standing Order No. 2022-VAC-1 (March 9, 2022), which are found on the Court's website. Consistent with the foregoing Announcement and Standing Order, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties shall file the "Notice of Consent or Absence of Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge," being docketed along with the instant order, no later than sixty (60) days after service of the Complaint on the first defendant that is served. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Notice, Consent, and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction, previously docketed in this case, are VACATED. Issued by the Clerk of Court on 6/1/2022. Associated Cases: 1:22-cv-00698-VAC, 1:22-cv-00699-VAC, 1:22-cv-00700-VAC(etg) |
| Case Assigned to Vacant Judgeship (2022). Please include initials of VAC after the case number on all documents filed. Associated Cases: 1:22-cv-00698-VAC, 1:22-cv-00699-VAC, 1:22-cv-00700-VAC (rjb) |
| Filing 5 Summonses Issued (please complete the top portion of the form and print out for use/service). (twk) |
| Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Valyrian IP LLC. (twk) |
| Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 6,970,706. (twk) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (twk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT filed with Jury Demand against Consolidated Communications Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ADEDC-3883732.) - filed by Valyrian IP LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Related Cases, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(twk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Valyrian IP LLC v. Consolidated Communications Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Valyrian IP LLC | |
| Represented By: | Jimmy C. Chong |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Consolidated Communications Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
