Thompson v. XTO Energy, Inc
Scott Thompson |
XTO Energy, Inc |
RUSCO Operating, LLC |
1:2022cv00784 |
June 13, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Delaware |
Vacant Judgeship (2022) |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Scott Thompson (Farnan, Michael) |
CASE CLOSED (etg) |
Filing 18 OPENING BRIEF in Support re #17 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by XTO Energy, Inc.Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 8/2/2022. (Jauffret, Jennifer) |
Filing 17 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim - filed by XTO Energy, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Jauffret, Jennifer) |
Filing 16 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: identifying Corporate Parent Workrise Technologies Inc. for RUSCO Operating, LLC filed by RUSCO Operating, LLC. (Cronin, Laurence) |
Filing 15 OPENING BRIEF in Support re #14 MOTION to Intervene Under Rule 24 filed by RUSCO Operating, LLC.Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 8/2/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3 - 6, #4 Certificate of Compliance)(Cronin, Laurence) |
Filing 14 MOTION to Intervene Under Rule 24 - filed by RUSCO Operating, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit A)(Cronin, Laurence) |
Pro Hac Vice Attorney Sarah Miley for XTO Energy, Inc added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (mpb) |
Filing 13 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Michael A. Josephson, Andrew W. Dunlap, and Alyssa J. White - filed by Scott Thompson. (Farnan, Michael) |
SO ORDERED, re #13 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Michael A. Josephson, Andrew W. Dunlap, and Alyssa J. White filed by Scott Thompson. Ordered by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 7/8/2022. (etg) |
Pro Hac Vice Attorney Katelyn W. McCombs for XTO Energy, Inc added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (mpb) |
Pro Hac Vice Attorney Felicity A. Fowler for XTO Energy, Inc added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (mpb) |
Filing 12 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: identifying Corporate Parent Exxon Mobil Oil Corporation for XTO Energy, Inc filed by XTO Energy, Inc. (Jauffret, Jennifer) |
Filing 11 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to move, answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint to and including July 19, 2022 - filed by XTO Energy, Inc. (Jauffret, Jennifer) |
Filing 10 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Felicity A. Fowler of McGinnis Lochridge - filed by XTO Energy, Inc. (Jauffret, Jennifer) |
SO ORDERED re #11 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to move, answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint to and including July 19, 2022 (Set/Reset Answer Deadlines: XTO Energy, Inc answer due 7/19/2022). ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 7/1/2022. (dlw) |
SO ORDERED re #10 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Felicity A. Fowler of McGinnis Lochridge, #9 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney David B. Jordan, Sarah J. Miley and Katelyn W. McCombs filed by XTO Energy, Inc. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 7/1/2022. (dlw) |
Filing 9 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney David B. Jordan, Sarah J. Miley and Katelyn W. McCombs of Littler Mendelson, P.C. - filed by XTO Energy, Inc. (Jauffret, Jennifer) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Christine Dealy Haynes on behalf of XTO Energy, Inc (Haynes, Christine) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Jennifer C. Bebko Jauffret on behalf of XTO Energy, Inc (Jauffret, Jennifer) |
Filing 6 VAC Notice, Consent, Non-Consent, Magistrate Referral (ntl) |
Filing 5 ORAL ORDER: This case has been assigned to the District of Delaware's Vacant Judgeship ("VAC"). Detailed information relating to VAC cases may be found in the Court's Announcement of March 3, 2022 and Standing Order No. 2022-VAC-1 (March 9, 2022), which are found on the Court's website. Consistent with the foregoing Announcement and Standing Order, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties shall file the "Notice of Consent or Absence of Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge," being docketed along with the instant order, no later than sixty (60) days after service of the Complaint on the first defendant that is served. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Notice, Consent, and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction, previously docketed in this case, are VACATED. Issued by the Clerk of Court on 6/15/2022. (ntl) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Scott Thompson. XTO Energy, Inc served on 6/14/2022, answer due 7/5/2022. (Farnan, Michael) |
Case Assigned to Vacant Judgeship (2022). Please include initials of VAC after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to XTO Energy, Inc on 6/14/2022. (smg) |
Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (smg) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed with Jury Demand against XTO Energy, Inc ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ADEDC-3895047.) - filed by Scott Thompson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(smg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.