Eaton v. UHS of Dover, LLC
Plaintiff: Deborah A. Eaton
Defendant: UHS of Dover, LLC A Delaware Limited Liability Company doing business as Dover Behavioral Health System
Case Number: 1:2022cv00786
Filed: June 14, 2022
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware
Presiding Judge: Vacant Judgeship (2022)
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 20, 2022 Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint - filed by UHS of Dover, LLC. (Wright, Cheneise) Modified on 7/20/2022 (dlw).
July 20, 2022 Opinion or Order SO ORDERED re #7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint (Set/Reset Answer Deadlines: UHS of Dover, LLC answer due 8/18/2022). ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 7/20/2022. (dlw)
June 22, 2022 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Deborah A. Eaton. UHS of Dover, LLC served on 6/21/2022, answer due 7/12/2022. (Fletcher, William)
June 22, 2022 Filing 5 VAC Notice, Consent, Non-Consent, Magistrate Referral (ntl)
June 22, 2022 Filing 4 ORAL ORDER: This case has been assigned to the District of Delaware's Vacant Judgeship ("VAC"). Detailed information relating to VAC cases may be found in the Court's Announcement of March 3, 2022 and Standing Order No. 2022-VAC-1 (March 9, 2022), which are found on the Court's website. Consistent with the foregoing Announcement and Standing Order, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties shall file the "Notice of Consent or Absence of Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge," being docketed along with the instant order, no later than sixty (60) days after service of the Complaint on the first defendant that is served. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Notice, Consent, and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction, previously docketed in this case, are VACATED. Issued by the Clerk of Court on 6/22/2022. (ntl)
June 22, 2022 Case Assigned to Vacant Judgeship (2022). Please include initials of VAC after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb)
June 14, 2022 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to UHS of Dover, LLC on 6/14/2022. (twk)
June 14, 2022 Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (twk)
June 14, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed with Jury Demand against UHS of Dover, LLC ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number BDEDC-3895695.) - filed by Deborah A. Eaton. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(twk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Eaton v. UHS of Dover, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Deborah A. Eaton
Represented By: William D. Fletcher, Jr.
Represented By: Dianna E Stuart
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UHS of Dover, LLC A Delaware Limited Liability Company doing business as Dover Behavioral Health System
Represented By: Cheneise Wright
Represented By: Francis G.X. Pileggi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?