Nightmist IP LLC v. Lenovo US, Inc.
Nightmist IP LLC |
Lenovo US, Inc. |
1:2022cv00869 |
June 28, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Delaware |
Maryellen Noreika |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 1 Patent Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to Answer the Complaint to 09/02/2022 - filed by Nightmist IP LLC. (Chong, Jimmy) |
SO ORDERED, re #9 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to Answer the Complaint to 09/02/2022 filed by Nightmist IP LLC, Set/Reset Answer Deadlines: Lenovo US, Inc. answer due 9/2/2022. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 8/11/2022. (mdb) |
Filing 8 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to Answer the Complaint to 08/19/2022 - filed by Nightmist IP LLC. (Chong, Jimmy) |
SO ORDERED re #8 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to answer, move, or otherwise respond the Complaint to 08/19/2022 (Set/Reset Answer Deadlines: Lenovo US, Inc. answer due 8/19/2022). ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 7/8/2022. (dlw) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Nightmist IP LLC. Lenovo US, Inc. served on 6/29/2022, answer due 7/20/2022. (Chong, Jimmy) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Howard L. Wernow - filed by Nightmist IP LLC. (Chong, Jimmy) |
Case Assigned to Judge Maryellen Noreika. Please include the initials of the Judge (MN) after the case number on all documents filed. Associated Cases: 1:22-cv-00868-MN, 1:22-cv-00869-MN (rjb) |
Pro Hac Vice Attorney Howard L. Wernow for Nightmist IP LLC added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (mpb) |
SO ORDERED re (6 in 1:22-cv-00868-MN, 6 in 1:22-cv-00869-MN, 6 in 1:22-cv-00867-MN) MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Howard L. Wernow filed by Nightmist IP LLC. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 7/6/2022. (dlw) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Lenovo US, Inc. (srs) |
Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Nightmist IP LLC. (srs) |
Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) US 8,902,179. (srs) |
Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (srs) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed with Jury Demand against Lenovo US, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ADEDC-3905206.) - filed by Nightmist IP LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Related Case)(srs) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Nightmist IP LLC v. Lenovo US, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Nightmist IP LLC | |
Represented By: | Jimmy C. Chong |
Represented By: | Howard L. Wernow |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Lenovo US, Inc. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.