SurgeTech, LLC v. Uber Technologies Inc.
| SurgeTech, LLC |
| Uber Technologies Inc. doing business as Uber and Uber Technologies, Inc. doing business as Uber |
| 1:2022cv00882 |
| June 29, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Vacant Judgeship (2022) |
| Christopher J Burke |
| Gregory B Williams |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 66 [SEALED] DECLARATION re #65 Opening Brief in Support of Andrew Robb by Uber Technologies, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H)(Farnan, Brian) |
| Filing 65 OPENING BRIEF in Support re #64 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Uber Technologies, Inc..Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 4/10/2023. (Farnan, Brian) |
| Filing 64 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings - filed by Uber Technologies, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Farnan, Brian) |
| Filing 63 CLAIM Construction Chart by SurgeTech, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits 1-25)(Tigan, Jeremy) Modified on 3/24/2023 (ntl). |
| Filing 62 NOTICE OF SERVICE of Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc.'s First Supplemental Responses and Objections to Plaintiff SurgeTech, LLC's First Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 2-3) filed by Uber Technologies, Inc..(Farnan, Brian) |
| Filing 61 NOTICE OF SERVICE of Plaintiff's Objections and Responses to Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc.'s Third Set of Interrogatories (No. 11) filed by SurgeTech, LLC.(Tigan, Jeremy) |
| Filing 60 NOTICE OF SERVICE of Plaintiff SurgeTech LLC's Responses and Proposed Constructions to Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc.'s Identification of Claim Constructions filed by SurgeTech, LLC.(Tigan, Jeremy) |
| Filing 59 NOTICE OF SERVICE of Plaintiff SurgeTech LLC's Supplemental List of Claim Terms for Construction filed by SurgeTech, LLC.(Tigan, Jeremy) |
SO ORDERED, re #56 MOTION for an Order Authorizing the Issuance of a Letter of Request [UNOPPOSED] filed by Uber Technologies, Inc. Signed by Judge Gregory B. Williams on 3/7/23. (ntl)
|
| Filing 58 NOTICE OF SERVICE of Plaintiff SurgeTech LLC's List of Claim Terms for Construction filed by SurgeTech, LLC.(Tigan, Jeremy) |
| Filing 57 NOTICE OF SERVICE of Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc.'s Identification of Claim Constructions filed by Uber Technologies, Inc..(Farnan, Brian) |
| Filing 56 MOTION for an Order Authorizing the Issuance of a Letter of Request [UNOPPOSED] - filed by Uber Technologies, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibits A-I, #3 Exhibits 1-10)(Farnan, Brian) |
|
SO ORDERED, re #55 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to (1) Exchange Constructions; (2) Exchange Counter-Constructions; and (3) File Joint Claim Construction Chart to (1) March 1, 2023, (2) March 13, 2023, and (3) March 24, 2023 filed by Uber Technologies, Inc. Signed by Judge Gregory B. Williams on 2/17/23. (ntl)
|
| Filing 55 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to (1) Exchange Constructions; (2) Exchange Counter-Constructions; and (3) File Joint Claim Construction Chart to (1) March 1, 2023, (2) March 13, 2023, and (3) March 24, 2023 - filed by Uber Technologies, Inc.. (Farnan, Brian) |
|
Filing 54
ORAL ORDER: The Court has reviewed the parties' Stipulation Amending Scheduling Order (D.I. 52). The Court cannot accommodate having a month less to prepare for claim construction. Thus, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties shall, no later than Thursday, February 16, 2023, submit a revised proposed stipulation that either (1) keeps the Joint Claim Construction Brief being due no later than June 16, 2023 and keeps the current Markman Hearing date, or (2) extends the Joint Claim Construction Brief due date to July 17, 2023, as the parties have proposed, with the understanding that the claim construction hearing will need to be rescheduled to February 22, 2024 at 10:00 AM. ORDERED by Judge Gregory B. Williams on 2/14/23. (ntl)
|
| Filing 53 NOTICE OF SERVICE of Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc.'s Third Set of Interrogatories (No.11) to Plaintiff SurgeTech, LLC filed by Uber Technologies, Inc..(Farnan, Brian) |
| Filing 52 STIPULATION Amending Scheduling Order by Uber Technologies, Inc.. (Farnan, Brian) |
| Filing 51 NOTICE OF SERVICE of Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc.'s Preliminary Invalidity Contentions filed by Uber Technologies, Inc..(Farnan, Brian) |
| Filing 50 NOTICE OF SERVICE of Plaintiff's Disclosure of Asserted Claims and Infringement Contentions filed by SurgeTech, LLC.(Tigan, Jeremy) |
|
SO ORDERED, re #49 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME (1) for Plaintiff SurgeTech, LLC to serve its initial infringement contentions and (2) for Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc. to serve its initial invalidity contentions to December 14, 2022 and February 9, 2023, respectively filed by SurgeTech, LLC. Signed by Judge Gregory B. Williams on 12/14/22. (ntl)
|
| Filing 49 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME (1) for Plaintiff SurgeTech, LLC to serve its initial infringement contentions and (2) for Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc. to serve its initial invalidity contentions to December 14, 2022 and February 9, 2023, respectively - filed by SurgeTech, LLC. (Tigan, Jeremy) |
| Filing 48 ANSWER to Amended Complaint, re: #45 Amended Complaint with Jury Demand by Uber Technologies, Inc..(Farnan, Brian) |
| Filing 47 NOTICE OF SERVICE of Plaintiff SurgeTech LLC's Initial ESI Disclosures Pursuant to the Default Standard for Discovery filed by SurgeTech, LLC.(Tigan, Jeremy) |
| Filing 46 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 11,334,598 B2 ;11,360,999 B2 ;11,475,047 B2 (Amended). (Tigan, Jeremy) |
| Filing 45 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Uber Technologies, Inc.- filed by SurgeTech, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A-N)(Tigan, Jeremy) |
| Filing 44 NOTICE OF SERVICE of Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc.'s Initial ESI Disclosures Pursuant to The Default Standard for Discovery filed by Uber Technologies, Inc..(Farnan, Brian) |
|
Filing 43
ORDER re #42 MOTION for Leave to File Amended Complaint (Unopposed) filed by SurgeTech, LLC. Signed by Judge Gregory B. Williams on 11/22/22. (ntl)
|
| Filing 42 MOTION for Leave to File Amended Complaint (Unopposed) - filed by SurgeTech, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Amended Complaint, #2 Exhibits A-N to Amended Complaint, #3 Exhibit B - Blackline)(Tigan, Jeremy) |
|
SO ORDERED, re #41 PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Gregory B. Williams on 11/15/22. (ntl)
|
| Filing 41 PROPOSED ORDER Proposed Protective Order by Uber Technologies, Inc.. (Farnan, Michael) |
| Filing 40 NOTICE OF SERVICE of Plaintiff's Responses to Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc.'s Second Set of Interrogatories (No. 10) filed by SurgeTech, LLC.(Tigan, Jeremy) |
|
SO ORDERED, re #39 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to submit a proposed Protective Order to 11/14/2022 filed by Uber Technologies, Inc. Signed by Judge Gregory B. Williams on 11/8/22. (ntl)
|
| Filing 39 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to submit a proposed Protective Order to 11/14/2022 - filed by Uber Technologies, Inc.. (Farnan, Brian) |
| Filing 38 NOTICE OF SERVICE of SurgeTech, LLC's Rule 26 Initial Disclosures filed by SurgeTech, LLC.(Tigan, Jeremy) |
| Filing 37 NOTICE OF SERVICE of Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc.'s Rule 26(a)(1) Initial Disclosures filed by Uber Technologies, Inc..(Farnan, Brian) |
| Filing 36 Letter to The Honorable Gregory B. Williams from Jeremy A. Tigan regarding SurgeTech, LLC's response to Uber Technologies, Inc.'s October 26, 2022 letter - re #33 Letter, 29 Order,,,,,,,,. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Tigan, Jeremy) |
| Filing 35 Official Transcript of Teleconference held on 10.24.2022 before Judge Gregory Williams. Court Reporter/Transcriber Michele Rofle,Email: michele_rolfe@ded.uscourts.gov. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or order/purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date, it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 11/17/2022. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 11/28/2022. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 1/25/2023. (Rolfe, Michele) |
|
Filing 34
SCHEDULING ORDER: Fact Discovery completed by 1/26/2024. Status Report due by 9/29/2023. Dispositive Motions due by 6/14/2024. Joint Claim Construction Brief due by 6/16/2023. A Markman Hearing is set for 8/29/2023 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6B before Judge Gregory B. Williams. A Pretrial Conference is set for 10/11/2024 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6B before Judge Gregory B. Williams. A 5-day Jury Trial is set for 10/21/2024 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 6B before Judge Gregory B. Williams. Signed by Judge Gregory B. Williams on 10/27/2022. (etg)
|
| Filing 33 Letter to The Honorable Gregory B. Williams from Brian E. Farnan regarding Plaintiff's Standing. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3)(Farnan, Brian) |
| Filing 32 Joint PROPOSED ORDER -- Revised [Proposed] Scheduling Order -- re 29 Order,,,,,,,, by SurgeTech, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter to The Honorable Gregory B. Williams)(Tigan, Jeremy) |
| Filing 31 NOTICE OF SERVICE of (1) Plaintiff's Responses to Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc.'s First Set of Requests for Production (Nos. 1-39) and (2) Plaintiff's Responses to Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc.'s First Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 1-9) filed by SurgeTech, LLC.(Tigan, Jeremy) |
| Filing 30 NOTICE OF SERVICE of (i) Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc.'s Responses and Objections to Plaintiff SurgeTech, LLC's First Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 1-12) and (ii) Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc.'s Objections and Responses to SurgeTech, LLC's First Set of Requests for Production (Nos. 1-40) filed by Uber Technologies, Inc..(Farnan, Michael) |
|
Filing 29
ORAL ORDER: Having reviewed the parties' proposed scheduling order, D.I. 28, and the letter attached thereto, D.I. 28-1, and having held a Rule 16 Scheduling Conference on October 24, 2022, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED (1) that the parties shall, no later than Wednesday, October 26, 2022, submit an updated joint proposed scheduling order that includes the following dates: 3(e). patentee's final infringement contentions on or before October 27, 2023; 3(f). accused infringer's final invalidity contentions on or before December 15, 2023; 4(a). fact discovery completed on or before January 26, 2024; 4(f)(i). disclosure of expert testimony on or before February 16, 2024 for opening reports, March 22, 2024 for answering reports, and April 12, 2024 for reply reports; 4(f)(iii). expert discovery complete on or before May 17, 2024; 10. the Markman hearing will be held on August 29, 2023 at 10:00 a.m.; 13(a). case dispositive motions filed on or before June 14, 2024; 19. the Pretrial Conference will be held on October 11, 2024 at 10:00 a.m.; and 21. this matter is scheduled for a five (5) day jury trial beginning at 9:30 a.m. on October 21, 2024; and (2) that the parties shall confirm in their cover letter that their joint proposed amended scheduling order is consistent with the Court's patent, non-ANDA template scheduling order, which is available at https://www.ded.uscourts.gov/judge/judge-gregory-b-williams (under Forms, last updated October 18, 2022). IT IS ALSO HEREBY ORDERED that no later than Wednesday, October 26, 2022, Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc. ("Uber") shall file a letter outlining the issues it raised during the scheduling conference regarding possible issues with Plaintiff Surgetech, LLC's ("Surgetech") ownership of the asserted patents and how this issue may affect the scheduling order. No later than Friday, October 28, 2022, Surgetech shall file a letter responding to Uber's letter and providing Surgetech's position on this issue. ORDERED by Judge Gregory B. Williams on 10/25/22. (ntl)
|
| Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Gregory B. Williams - Telephone Conference held on 10/24/2022. (Court Reporter M. Rolfe.) (ntl) |
| Filing 28 Joint PROPOSED ORDER -- Revised Proposed Scheduling Order -- re 26 Order,,,,,,,, by SurgeTech, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Letter to The Honorable Gregory B. Williams)(Tigan, Jeremy) |
| Filing 27 NOTICE OF SERVICE of Plaintiff's Disclosure of Asserted Patents, Accused Products, and Damages Model filed by SurgeTech, LLC.(Tigan, Jeremy) |
|
Filing 26
ORAL ORDER: The Court has reviewed the letter from Jeremy A. Tigan of October 17, 2022 that requests four (4) changes to the Court's template scheduling order for patent, non-ANDA cases. D.I. 25-1. The Court has also reviewed the provisions of the parties' proposed scheduling order that were identified in the letter (i.e., paragraphs 4(c), 4(e)(i), 8, and 12). D.I. 25. The Court will permit the parties to alter the scheduling order as requested in paragraphs 4(c), 4(e)(i), 8, and 12, so long as the parties add the following language to their proposed scheduling order: "The parties understand and expressly agree that the Court will not be responsible to hear and/or resolve any discovery disputes arising from or related to the alteration of the terms of Judge Williams' form scheduling order for patent, non-ANDA cases. With respect to those specific alterations, the parties will be left to resolve any such discovery disputes between themselves." Furthermore, the parties shall add the following language to their proposed scheduling order as a new Section 13(d): "Ranking of Summary Judgment Motions. Any party that files more than one summary judgment motion shall number each motion to indicate the order in which the party wishes the Court to review its pending motions. The first motion the party wishes the Court to consider shall be designated #1, the second motion shall be designated #2, and so on. The Court will review the party's summary judgment motions in the order designated by the party. If the Court decides to deny a motion filed by the party, barring exceptional reasons determined sua sponte by the Court, the Court will not review any lower ranked summary judgment motions filed by the party." The parties shall file a joint revised proposed scheduling order consistent with this Oral Order, no later than October 21, 2022. If there are no additional proposed changes and no remaining disagreements between the parties in the joint revised proposed scheduling order, the Court will cancel the scheduling teleconference scheduled for Monday, October 24, 2022, at 3:00 p.m. ORDERED by Judge Gregory B. Williams on 10/18/22. (ntl)
|
| Filing 25 PROPOSED ORDER -- Scheduling Order -- re 22 Order Setting Teleconference,,, by SurgeTech, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Letter to the Honorable Gregory B. Williams)(Tigan, Jeremy) |
|
SO ORDERED, re #24 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Kevin P. Johnson, Edward J. DeFranco, Eric H. Huang, James M. Glass, Sean T. Gloth, Quincy Lu and Christopher Smith filed by SurgeTech, LLC. Signed by Judge Gregory B. Williams on 10/17/22. (ntl)
|
| Filing 24 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Kevin P. Johnson, Edward J. DeFranco, Eric H. Huang, James M. Glass, Sean T. Gloth, Quincy Lu and Christopher Smith - filed by SurgeTech, LLC. (Blumenfeld, Jack) |
| Pro Hac Vice Attorney Ashbey N. Morgan, Mark N. Reiter, Andrew W. Robb, Robert A. Vincent, and Audrey Yang for Uber Technologies, Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (mkr) |
| Filing 23 NOTICE OF SERVICE of Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc.'s Second Set of Interrogatories (No. 10) to Plaintiff SurgeTech, LLC filed by Uber Technologies, Inc..(Farnan, Brian) |
|
Filing 22
ORAL ORDER: Pursuant to the parties' request (D.I. 21), a thirty (30) minute scheduling teleconference will be held on Monday, October 24, 2022 at 3:00 p.m. The parties shall arrange for the teleconference and shall provide chambers with the call-in information. At least seven (7) days prior to the scheduling conference, the parties shall jointly file a scheduling order consistent with the Court's patent, non-ANDA template available at https://www.ded.uscourts.gov/judge/judge-gregory-b-williams. The parties may jointly file an accompanying letter that explains any disagreements between the parties and any requested deviations from the Court's template (as well as good cause therefor). ORDERED by Judge Gregory B. Williams on 10/6/22. (ntl)
|
| Filing 21 Letter to The Honorable Gregory B. Williams from Jack B. Blumenfeld regarding request for scheduling conference. (Blumenfeld, Jack) |
|
Filing 20
ORAL ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is no longer referred to Magistrate Judge Burke. This matter has been reassigned to Judge Gregory B. Williams. ORDERED by Judge Gregory B. Williams on 9/13/22. (ntl)
|
| Case no longer referred to Judge Christopher J. Burke. (ntl) |
|
SO ORDERED, re #17 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Mark Reiter, Robert Vincent, Andrew Robb, Audrey Yang, and Ashbey Morgan filed by Uber Technologies, Inc. Signed by Judge Gregory B. Williams on 9/9/22. (ntl)
|
| Filing 19 NOTICE OF SERVICE of (1) Plaintiff's First Set of Interrogatories to Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc. (Nos. 1-12) and (2) Plaintiff's First Set of Requests for Production to Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc. (Nos. 1-40) filed by SurgeTech, LLC.(Tigan, Jeremy) |
| Filing 18 NOTICE OF SERVICE of (i) Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc.'s First Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 1-9) to Plaintiff SurgeTech, LLC and (ii) Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc.'s First Set of Requests for Production (Nos. 1-39) to Plaintiff SurgeTech, LLC filed by Uber Technologies, Inc..(Farnan, Brian) |
| Filing 17 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Mark Reiter, Robert Vincent, Andrew Robb, Audrey Yang, and Ashbey Morgan - filed by Uber Technologies, Inc.. (Farnan, Brian) |
| Case Reassigned to Judge Gregory B. Williams. Please include the initials of the Judge (GBW) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
| Filing 16 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Uber Technologies, Inc.. (Farnan, Brian) |
| Filing 15 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by Uber Technologies, Inc..(Farnan, Brian) |
|
Filing 14
ORAL ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties shall meet and confer and discuss, in person and/or by telephone, each of the matters listed on Judge Burke's Case Management Checklist (Checklist). At the time called for by Standing Order No. 2022-VAC-1, the parties shall jointly file the following: (i) a copy of the Checklist, indicating the names of Lead Counsel and Delaware Counsel for each party; (ii) a proposed Scheduling Order, which is consistent with Judge Burke's "Rule 16 Scheduling Order - Patent"; and (iii) a letter, not to exceed three pages, that contains the following: (a) a description of what this case is about; (b) the parties' positions regarding any disputes in the proposed Scheduling Order, and (c) a list of the three most significant topics (other than Scheduling Order disputes) discussed during the parties review of the Checklist items, along with a brief description as to what was discussed as to those topics. The proposed Scheduling Order shall not contain dates for motions hearings or for a pretrial conference or trial. Thereafter, the Court may schedule a Case Management Conference/Rule 16 Scheduling Conference to be held with Judge Burke. The Checklist and Scheduling Order can be found on Judge Burke's portion of the District Court's website. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 8/29/2022. (dlb)
|
| Remark: The parties should follow the Court's Standing Order Regarding Courtesy Copies, a copy of which is found on Judge Burke's portion of the District Court's webpage: #CJB Standing Order re Copies (dlb) |
| REMARK: The parties should be aware that the Court encourages the participation of newer attorneys in courtroom proceedings and at oral argument. Please see the Court's Standing Order Regarding Courtroom Opportunities for Newer Attorneys, a link to which is provided here for the parties' convenience:#http://www.ded.uscourts.gov/sites/ded/files/forms/StandingOrder2017.pdf (dlb) |
| Filing 13 ORAL ORDER: The parties having filed the appropriate form advising the Court that they do not unanimously consent to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, until further order of the Court, this case will remain assigned to the VAC (2022) docket. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is referred to Magistrate Judge Christopher J. Burke solely for the following purposes: (1) to adjudicate discovery (including fact and expert discovery) and protective order disputes; (2) to issue or modify a scheduling order; (3) to review stipulated orders and pro hac vice motions; and (4) to review requests for mediation in cases other than patent and securities cases. Issued by the Clerk of Court on 8/26/22. (ntl) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael J. Farnan on behalf of Uber Technologies, Inc. (Farnan, Michael) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Brian E. Farnan on behalf of Uber Technologies, Inc. (Farnan, Brian) |
| Filing 10 VAC Magistrate Non-Consent completed by the parties filed by SurgeTech, LLC. (Blumenfeld, Jack) |
| Filing 9 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for defendant Uber Technologies Inc., d/b/a Uber to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint (D.I. 1) to September 6, 2022 - filed by SurgeTech, LLC. (Blumenfeld, Jack) |
|
SO ORDERED, re #9 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for defendant Uber Technologies Inc., d/b/a Uber to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint (D.I. 1) to September 6, 2022 filed by SurgeTech, LLC. Set Answer Deadlines: Uber Technologies, Inc. answer due 9/6/2022. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 7/15/2022. (etg)
|
| Filing 8 VAC Notice, Consent, Non-Consent, Magistrate Referral (etg) |
| Filing 7 ORAL ORDER: This case has been assigned to the District of Delaware's Vacant Judgeship ("VAC"). Detailed information relating to VAC cases may be found in the Court's Announcement of March 3, 2022 and Standing Order No. 2022-VAC-1 (March 9, 2022), which are found on the Court's website. Consistent with the foregoing Announcement and Standing Order, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties shall file the "Notice of Consent or Absence of Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge," being docketed along with the instant order, no later than sixty (60) days after service of the Complaint on the first defendant that is served. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Notice, Consent, and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction, previously docketed in this case, are VACATED. Issued by the Clerk of Court on 7/7/2022. (etg) |
| Case Assigned to Vacant Judgeship (2022). Please include initials of VAC after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by SurgeTech, LLC. Uber Technologies, Inc. served on 7/1/2022, answer due 7/22/2022. (Blumenfeld, Jack) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Uber Technologies Inc. on 6/29/2022. (srs) |
| Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by SurgeTech, LLC. (srs) |
| Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 11,334,598 B2 ;11,360,999 B2. (srs) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (srs) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT filed with Jury Demand against Uber Technologies Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ADEDC-3906783.) - filed by SurgeTech, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-K, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(srs) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
