Acceleration Bay, LLC v. Amazon Web Services, Inc.
| Acceleration Bay, LLC |
| Amazon Web Services, Inc. |
| 1:2022cv00904 |
| July 6, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Richard G Andrews |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 1 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Alan M. Fisch, R. William Sigler, Jeffrey M. Saltman and Lisa Phillips - filed by Amazon Web Services, Inc.. (Blumenfeld, Jack)
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #9 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Alan M. Fisch, R. William Sigler, Jeffrey M. Saltman and Lisa Phillips, filed by Amazon Web Services, Inc.. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 8/16/2022. (nms)
|
|
Pro Hac Vice Attorney Aaron M. Frankel for Acceleration Bay, LLC added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (mpb)
|
|
Pro Hac Vice Attorneys Michael H. Lee, Christina M. Finn, Paul J. Andre, Lisa Kobialka, and James R. Hannah for Acceleration Bay, LLC added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (twk)
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Paul J. Andre, Lisa Kobialka, James Hannah, Michael Lee, Christina Finn, Aaron M. Frankel and Marcus Colucci - filed by Acceleration Bay, LLC. (Rovner, Philip)
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #8 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Paul J. Andre, Lisa Kobialka, James Hannah, Michael Lee, Christina Finn, Aaron M. Frankel and Marcus Colucci, filed by Acceleration Bay, LLC. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 8/1/2022. (nms)
|
|
Filing 7
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for the defendant to move, answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint to September 15, 2022 - filed by Amazon Web Services, Inc.. (Blumenfeld, Jack)
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #7 STIPULATION and Order (*Reset Answer Deadlines: Amazon Web Services, Inc. answer due 9/15/2022). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 7/19/2022. (nms)
|
|
Filing 6
EXHIBITS 34-39 to #1 Complaint, by Acceleration Bay, LLC. (Rovner, Philip) Modified on 7/14/2022 (nms).
|
|
Case Assigned to Judge Richard G. Andrews. Please include the initials of the Judge (RGA) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb)
|
|
Filing 5
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Acceleration Bay, LLC. Amazon Web Services, Inc. served on 7/7/2022, answer due 7/28/2022. (Rovner, Philip)
|
|
Filing 4
Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: identifying Corporate Parent Forward People LLC for Acceleration Bay, LLC filed by Acceleration Bay, LLC. (mpb)
|
|
Filing 3
Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 6,732,147 B1 ;6,714,966 B1 ;6,701,344 B1 ;6,910,069 B1 ;6,829,634 B1. (mpb)
|
|
Filing 2
Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (mpb)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement with jury demand against Amazon Web Services, Inc. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ADEDC-3910518) - filed by Acceleration Bay, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits 1-12, #2 Exhibits 13-19, #3 Exhibits 20-24, #4 Exhibit 25 part 1, #5 Exhibit 25 part 2, #6 Exhibits 25, part 3-27, #7 Exhibits 28-33, #8 Civil Cover Sheet)(mpb) Modified on 7/13/2022 (nms).
|
|
No Summons Issued. (mpb)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
