Stanfield v. Fritzlen
| Earl Richard, Jr. and Earl Richard Stanfield, Jr. |
| Bill Fritzlen |
| 1:2022cv00921 |
| July 11, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Maryellen Noreika |
| Constitutional - State Statute |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
Return of Service Executed by Earl Richard Stanfield, Jr. Bill Fritzlen served on 8/17/2022, answer due 9/7/2022. (srs)
|
|
Filing 6
Letter to Earl Stanfield from Clerk's Office regarding summons forms - re #5 Letter. (smg)
|
|
CORRECTING ENTRY: Address Corrected per D.I. #1 . (srs)
|
|
Filing 5
Letter to Clerk from Earl Richard Stanfield regarding summons forms. (smg)
|
|
CORRECTING ENTRY: Petitioner's Name Updated Per D.I. #4 Notice. (srs)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE requesting name correction by Earl Richard Stanfield Jr. (srs)
|
|
Case Assigned to Judge Maryellen Noreika. Please include the initials of the Judge (MN) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb)
|
|
Remark: Copy of Rule 4 Mailed to Petitioner (apk)
|
|
Filing 3
Summons Issued as to Bill Fritzlen on 7/11/2022. (Attachments: #1 Summons Issued)(apk)
|
|
Filing 2
Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (apk)
|
|
Filing 1
Petition for Writ of Mandamus filed Pro Se against Bill Fritzlen ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number DEX037731.) - filed by Earl Richard, Jr.(apk)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
