Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Pfizer Inc. et al
| Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. |
| Pfizer Inc., Pharmacia & Upjohn Co. LLC, BioNTech SE and BioNTech Manufacturing GmbH |
| 1:2022cv00924 |
| July 12, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Colm F Connolly |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
SO ORDERED, re (20 in 1:22-cv-00336-CFC), (8 in 1:22-cv-00924-CFC) MOTION to Consolidate Cases Proposed Stipulation and Order Regarding Case Consolidation. The -336 Action shall be the lead case and all future filings shall be made only in the -336 action. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 8/9/2022. Associated Cases: 1:22-cv-00336-CFC, 1:22-cv-00924-CFC(nmf)
|
| Case associated with lead case: Create association to 1:22-cv-00336-CFC. ALL FUTURE FILINGS SHALL BE MADE IN LEAD CASE NO. 22-CV-336-CFC ONLY. (nmf) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Consolidate Cases Proposed Stipulation and Order Regarding Case Consolidation - filed by Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. (Townsend, Ethan) |
| Pro Hac Vice Attorney William G. Gaede, III, Sarah Chapin Columbia, Sarah J. Fischer, and Ian B. Brooks for Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. Associated Cases: 1:22-cv-00924-CFC, 1:22-cv-00925-CFC(mpb) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Colm F. Connolly. Please include the initials of the Judge (CFC) after the case number on all documents filed. Associated Cases: 1:22-cv-00924-CFC, 1:22-cv-00925-CFC (rjb) |
|
SO ORDERED, re (7 in 1:22-cv-00924-CFC) MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney William Gaede, Sarah Chapin Columbia, Ian B. Brooks, Sarah J. Fischer filed by Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc., (8 in 1:22-cv-00925-CFC) MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney William Gaede, Sarah Chapin Columbia, Ian B. Brooks, Sarah Fischer filed by Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 7/20/2022. Associated Cases: 1:22-cv-00924-CFC, 1:22-cv-00925-CFC(nmf)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney William Gaede, Sarah Chapin Columbia, Ian B. Brooks, Sarah J. Fischer - filed by Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. (Townsend, Ethan) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Pharmacia & Upjohn Co. LLC served on 7/13/2022, answer due 8/3/2022. (Townsend, Ethan) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Pfizer Inc. served on 7/13/2022, answer due 8/3/2022. (Townsend, Ethan) |
| Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. (mpb) |
| Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) US 11,382,979 B1. (mpb) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (mpb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for PATENT INFRINGEMENT filed with Jury Demand against BioNTech Manufacturing GmbH, BioNTech SE, Pfizer Inc., Pharmacia & Upjohn Co. LLC ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ADEDC-3913675.) - filed by Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2-11, #3 Exhibit 12-26, #4 Exhibit 27-34, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(mpb) |
| No Summons Issued. (mpb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
