Ryan v. Delaware Park Casino et al
| Lilia Q. Ryan |
| Delaware Park Casino and Delaware Park Management Co. LLC |
| 1:2022cv00949 |
| July 19, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Richard G Andrews |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Remark: Copy of Rule 4 with Acknowledgement of Receipt and 2 summons mailed to Pro Se Plaintiff (lam) |
| Remark: Filing Fee Paid, Receipt Number: DEX037906 (lam) |
Filing 3
ORDER: Plaintiff shall submit IFP long form application. Failure to submit item within 21 days will result in dismissal of action without prejudice (Notice of Compliance deadline set for 8/30/2022). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 8/9/2022. (Attachments: #1 IFP Long Form) (lak) Modified on 8/10/2022 (nms).
|
| Case Assigned to Judge Richard G. Andrews. Please include the initials of the Judge (RGA) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (twk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed Pro Se with Jury Demand against Delaware Park Casino, Delaware Park Management Co. LLC - filed by Lilia Q. Ryan. (No IFP, No Fee Paid). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(twk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
