Hair v. Officer Fritz et al
| Marvin Lee Hair, Jr. |
| Officer Fritz and Officer Micheal |
| 1:2022cv00976 |
| July 25, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Colm F Connolly |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 MOTION to Appoint Counsel - filed by Marvin Lee Hair, Jr. (apk) |
| Filing 5 Trust Fund Account Statement by Marvin Lee Hair, Jr (mpb) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis - filed by Marvin Lee Hair, Jr. (mpb) |
Filing 3
ORDER, Plaintiff shall submit IFP Application and certified Trust Fund Account Statement. Failure to submit items within 30 days will result in dismissal of action without prejudice. (Copy to pltf. with Mag. Consent Form). Notice of Compliance deadline set for 9/6/2022. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 8/4/2022. (twk)
|
| Case Assigned to Judge Colm F. Connolly. Please include the initials of the Judge (CFC) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (apk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed pursuant to 42:1983 with Jury Demand against Officer Fritz, Officer Micheal (NO FILING FEE PAID, NO IFP) - filed by Marvin Lee Hair, Jr.(apk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
