Launchip LLC v. CTC Triangle (USA) EC LLC et al
Plaintiff: Launchip LLC
Defendant: CTC Triangle (USA) EC LLC and CTC Triangle (USA) LLC
Case Number: 1:2022cv00995
Filed: July 28, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Delaware
Presiding Judge: Gregory B Williams
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 1 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 13, 2022 Filing 12 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) U.S. 8,203,275; U.S. 8,390,206. (etg)
September 13, 2022 CASE CLOSED (etg)
September 7, 2022 Case Reassigned to Judge Gregory B. Williams. Please include the initials of the Judge (GBW) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb)
September 2, 2022 Filing 11 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Launchip LLC as to CTC Triangle (USA) EC LLC, et al (Chong, Jimmy)
August 15, 2022 Filing 10 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to Answer the Complaint to 09/22/2022 - filed by Launchip LLC. (Chong, Jimmy)
August 15, 2022 Opinion or Order SO ORDERED, re #10 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to Answer the Complaint to 09/22/2022 filed by Launchip LLC -- Reset Answer Deadlines: CTC Triangle (USA) EC LLC answer due 9/22/2022; CTC Triangle (USA) LLC answer due 9/22/2022. ORDERED by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 8/15/22. (ntl)
August 8, 2022 Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Launchip LLC. CTC Triangle (USA) EC LLC served on 8/1/2022, answer due 8/22/2022; CTC Triangle (USA) LLC served on 8/2/2022, answer due 8/23/2022. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Chong, Jimmy)
August 4, 2022 Pro Hac Vice Attorney Howard L. Wernow for Launchip LLC added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. Associated Cases: 1:22-cv-00994-VAC, 1:22-cv-00995-VAC(twk)
August 3, 2022 Filing 8 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Howard L. Wernow - filed by Launchip LLC. (Chong, Jimmy)
August 3, 2022 Filing 7 VAC Notice, Consent, Non-Consent, Magistrate Referral Associated Cases: 1:22-cv-00994-VAC, 1:22-cv-00995-VAC (ntl)
August 3, 2022 Filing 6 ORAL ORDER: This case has been assigned to the District of Delaware's Vacant Judgeship ("VAC"). Detailed information relating to VAC cases may be found in the Court's Announcement of March 3, 2022 and Standing Order No. 2022-VAC-1 (March 9, 2022), which are found on the Court's website. Consistent with the foregoing Announcement and Standing Order, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties shall file the "Notice of Consent or Absence of Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge," being docketed along with the instant order, no later than sixty (60) days after service of the Complaint on the first defendant that is served. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Notice, Consent, and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction, previously docketed in this case, are VACATED. Issued by the Clerk of Court on 8/3/2022. Associated Cases: 1:22-cv-00994-VAC, 1:22-cv-00995-VAC (ntl)
August 3, 2022 Opinion or Order SO ORDERED, re (8 in 1:22-cv-00995-VAC, 8 in 1:22-cv-00994-VAC) MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Howard L. Wernow filed by Launchip LLC. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 8/3/22. Associated Cases: 1:22-cv-00994-VAC, 1:22-cv-00995-VAC (ntl)
August 3, 2022 Case Assigned to Vacant Judgeship (2022). Please include initials of VAC after the case number on all documents filed. Associated Cases: 1:22-cv-00994-VAC, 1:22-cv-00995-VAC (rjb)
July 28, 2022 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to CTC Triangle (USA) EC LLC on 7/28/2022; CTC Triangle (USA) LLC on 7/28/2022. (Attachments: #1 Summons Issued)(apk)
July 28, 2022 Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Launchip LLC. (apk)
July 28, 2022 Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) U.S. 8,203,275 ;U.S. 8,390,206. (apk)
July 28, 2022 Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (apk)
July 28, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT filed with Jury Demand against CTC Triangle (USA) EC LLC, CTC Triangle (USA) LLC ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ADEDC-3924762.) - filed by Launchip LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 List of Related Cases, #6 Civil Cover Sheet)(apk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Launchip LLC v. CTC Triangle (USA) EC LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Launchip LLC
Represented By: Jimmy C. Chong
Represented By: Howard L. Wernow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CTC Triangle (USA) EC LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CTC Triangle (USA) LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?