AMPT, LLC v. SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: AMPT, LLC
Defendant: SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. and SolarEdge Technologies Ltd.
Case Number: 1:2022cv00997
Filed: July 28, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Delaware
Presiding Judge: Colm F Connolly
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 11, 2022 Filing 7 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME Time for the Defendants to Answer, Move or Otherwise Respond to the Complaint (D.I. 1) to September 19, 2022 - filed by SolarEdge Technologies Ltd., SolarEdge Technologies, Inc.. (O'Byrne, Stephanie)
August 11, 2022 Opinion or Order SO ORDERED, re #7 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME Time for the Defendants to Answer, Move or Otherwise Respond to the Complaint (D.I. 1) to September 19, 2022, filed by SolarEdge Technologies, Inc., SolarEdge Technologies Ltd. Reset Answer Deadlines: SolarEdge Technologies Ltd. answer due 9/19/2022; SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. answer due 9/19/2022. Ordered by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 8/11/2022. (kmd)
August 3, 2022 Case Assigned to Judge Colm F. Connolly. Please include the initials of the Judge (CFC) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb)
July 29, 2022 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by AMPT, LLC. SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. served on 7/29/2022, answer due 8/19/2022. (Schladweiler, Benjamin)
July 28, 2022 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to SolarEdge Technologies Ltd. on 7/28/2022; SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. on 7/28/2022. (Attachments: #1 Summons Issued)(apk)
July 28, 2022 Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by AMPT, LLC. (apk)
July 28, 2022 Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s)(SEE PATENT REPORT). (apk)
July 28, 2022 Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (apk)
July 28, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT filed with Jury Demand against SolarEdge Technologies Ltd., SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ADEDC-3925084.) - filed by AMPT, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Civil Cover Sheet)(apk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: AMPT, LLC v. SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: AMPT, LLC
Represented By: Benjamin J. Schladweiler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SolarEdge Technologies, Inc.
Represented By: Stephanie E. O'Byrne
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SolarEdge Technologies Ltd.
Represented By: Stephanie E. O'Byrne
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?