Shird v. Duke Energy Corporation
| Pandoria Shird |
| Duke Energy Corporation |
| 1:2022cv00999 |
| July 29, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Christopher J Burke |
| Colm F Connolly |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 22 Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from Jody C. Barillare regarding Defendants Position on Discovery Dispute - re 16 Oral Order,,,,,,,, Order Setting Teleconference,,,,,,,. (Barillare, Jody) |
| Filing 21 ANSWER to Amended Complaint, re: #6 Amended Complaint by Duke Energy Corporation.(Barillare, Jody) |
| Filing 20 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Michael J. Puma and Doriyon C. Glass - filed by Duke Energy Corporation. (Barillare, Jody) |
SO ORDERED, re #20 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Michael J. Puma and Doriyon C. Glass, filed by Duke Energy Corporation. Ordered by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 9/26/2022. (kmd)
|
| Pro Hac Vice Attorney Michael J. Puma and Doriyon C. Glass for Duke Energy Corporation added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (mpb) |
| Filing 19 DECLARATION re #17 MOTION to Transfer Case to Western District of North Carolina of Domeko Hunter by Duke Energy Corporation. (Barillare, Jody) |
| Filing 18 OPENING BRIEF in Support re #17 MOTION to Transfer Case to Western District of North Carolina filed by Duke Energy Corporation.Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 10/7/2022. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Compliance)(Barillare, Jody) |
| Filing 17 MOTION to Transfer Case to Western District of North Carolina - filed by Duke Energy Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Barillare, Jody) |
|
Filing 16
ORAL ORDER Setting Teleconference: The Court has reviewed the parties' September 20, 2022 letter requesting a discovery dispute teleconference regarding one discovery dispute. (D.I. 14) It hereby ORDERS as follows with regard to this dispute: (1) A discovery dispute teleconference is set for 10/17/2022 at 11:00 AM before Judge Christopher J. Burke.; (2) By September 26, 2022, the party seeking relief shall file with the Court a letter, not to exceed three (3) single-spaced pages, in no less than 12-point font, outlining the issues in dispute and its position on those issues.; (3) By October 3, 2022, the party opposing the application for relief may file a letter, not to exceed three (3) single-spaced pages, in no less than 12-point font, outlining that party's reasons for its opposition.; (4) By October 11, 2022, the party seeking relief shall file with the Court a reply letter brief, not to exceed one (1) single-spaced page, in no less than 12-point font.; (5) The parties should also consult and follow Judge Burke's "Guidelines for Discovery Disputes," which is found in the "Guidelines" tab on Judge Burke's portion of the District Court's website.; (6) By no later than October 11, 2022, the parties shall jointly provide the Court's Courtroom Deputy, Ms. Benyo, with a dial-in number via e-mail to use for the call.; and (7) The Court may choose to resolve the dispute prior to the telephone conference and will, in that event, cancel the teleconference (however, if any party advises the Court in advance that a newer attorney will argue the dispute, see Standing Order Regarding Courtroom Opportunities for Newer Attorneys, https://www.ded.uscourts.gov/sites/ded/files/StandingOrder2017.pdf, then the Court will go forward with the conference). Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 9/20/22. (mlc)
|
| Filing 15 MOTION for Teleconference to Resolve Discovery Dispute - filed by Duke Energy Corporation. Motions referred to Christopher J. Burke.(Barillare, Jody) |
| Filing 14 Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from Jody C. Barillare regarding Joint Letter concerning a Discovery Dispute. (Barillare, Jody) |
|
Filing 13
ORAL ORDER: The Court, having reviewed the case history in light of the September 20, 2022 referral, hereby ORDERS that going forward, the procedures for resolving a dispute relating to discovery shall be as follows: Should counsel find, after good faith efforts including verbal communication among Delaware and Lead Counsel for all parties to the dispute, that they are unable to resolve a discovery matter, the parties involved in the dispute shall submit a joint letter with the text set out in the Court's standard Rule 16 Scheduling Order Non Patent, which can be found in the "Forms" tab of Magistrate Judge Burke's page on the District Court's website. The moving party (i.e., the party seeking relief from the Court) should also file a Motion For Teleconference To Resolve Discovery Dispute. The suggested text for this motion can be found in the same Forms tab. The Court will thereafter set a discovery dispute telephone conference and letter briefing schedule. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 9/20/2022. (mlc)
|
|
ORAL ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Christopher J. Burke for all disputes relating to discovery and the protective order. Ordered by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 9/20/2022. (nmf)
|
|
Filing 12
SO ORDERED, re #11 Stipulation Setting Briefing Schedule, filed by Duke Energy Corporation. Reset Briefing Schedule: re #9 MOTION to Certify Class Conditionally and Send Notice. Answering Brief due 10/10/2022. Reply Brief due 10/21/2022. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 9/13/2022. (kmd)
|
| Filing 11 STIPULATION Setting Briefing Schedule with [Proposed] Order by Duke Energy Corporation. (Barillare, Jody) |
| Filing 10 OPENING BRIEF in Support re #9 MOTION to Certify Class Conditionally and Send Notice filed by Pandoria Shird.Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 9/22/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to G, #2 Certificate of Compliance, #3 Rule 7.1.1 Statement)(Boyer, Matthew) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Certify Class Conditionally and Send Notice - filed by Pandoria Shird. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Boyer, Matthew) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Filing of Consent to Join Form by Pandoria Shird (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Boyer, Matthew) |
|
SO ORDERED, re #7 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to respond to Complaint to September 26, 2022 filed by Duke Energy Corporation, Set/Reset Answer Deadlines: Duke Energy Corporation answer due 9/26/2022. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 8/17/2022. (nmf)
|
| Filing 7 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to respond to Complaint to September 26, 2022 - filed by Duke Energy Corporation. (Barillare, Jody) |
| Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Duke Energy Corporation- filed by Pandoria Shird. (Attachments: #1 Summons Forms - Unsigned)(Boyer, Matthew) |
| Pro Hac Vice Attorney Gregg I. Shavitz and Michael Palitz for Pandoria Shird added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (srs) |
|
SO ORDERED, re #5 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Gregory I. Shavitz and Michael Palitz filed by Pandoria Shird. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 8/8/2022. (nmf)
|
| Case Assigned to Judge Colm F. Connolly. Please include the initials of the Judge (CFC) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Gregory I. Shavitz and Michael Palitz - filed by Pandoria Shird. (DeLuca, Lauren) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Filing of Consent to Join Form by Pandoria Shird (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(DeLuca, Lauren) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Duke Energy Corporation on 7/29/2022. (mpb) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (mpb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed with Jury Demand against Duke Energy Corporation ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ADEDC-3926142.) - filed by Pandoria Shird. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(mpb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
