Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. DivioTec Inc.
Plaintiff: Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant: DivioTec Inc.
Case Number: 1:2022cv01056
Filed: August 11, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Delaware
Presiding Judge: Richard G Andrews
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 1, 2022 Filing 10 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 6,473,527; 6,972,790; 8,537,242. (Attachments: #1 Order)(nms)
September 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 SO ORDERED Granting #8 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal (***Civil Case Terminated). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 9/1/2022. (nms)
September 1, 2022 Filing 8 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. (deBruin, David)
August 17, 2022 Case Assigned to Judge Richard G. Andrews. Please include the initials of the Judge (RGA) after the case number on all documents filed. Associated Cases: 1:22-cv-01056-RGA, 1:22-cv-01068-RGA, 1:22-cv-01072-RGA, 1:22-cv-01074-RGA (rjb)
August 16, 2022 Filing 7 Letter to Clerk of the Court, from David deBruin, regarding related cases. (deBruin, David) Modified on 8/17/2022 (nms).
August 16, 2022 CORRECTING ENTRY: The exhibit filed at D.I. 7 has been removed from the docket. Counsel was instructed to file a letter advising of all related matters. (nms)
August 11, 2022 Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against DivioTec Inc. - filed by Cedar Lane Technologies Inc..(deBruin, David) Modified on 8/16/2022 (nms).
August 11, 2022 Filing 5 Summonses Issued (please complete the top portion of the form and print out for use/service). (apk)
August 11, 2022 Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. (apk)
August 11, 2022 Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 6,473,527 ;6,972,790 ;8,537,242. (apk)
August 11, 2022 Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (apk)
August 11, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT filed with Jury Demand against DivioTec Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ADEDC-3934928.) - filed by Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit Appearance of Counsel, #6 Civil Cover Sheet)(apk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. DivioTec Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Represented By: David W. deBruin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DivioTec Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?