Amerita, Inc. v. Defreitas et al
| Amerita, Inc. |
| Deon Defreitas, Julie Alvino, Diane Labriola, Christine Nudo and Maya Murilo |
| 1:2022cv01197 |
| September 12, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Maryellen Noreika |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME ANSWER to November 28, 2022 - filed by Julie Alvino, Diane Labriola, Maya Murilo. (Gottesman, Brian) |
SO ORDERED re #16 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint to November 28, 2022 (Set/Reset Answer Deadlines: Julie Alvino answer due 11/28/2022; Diane Labriola answer due 11/28/2022; Maya Murilo answer due 11/28/2022). ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 10/19/2022. (dlw)
|
| Filing 15 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons served on Maya Murilo on 9/27/2022, filed by Amerita, Inc.. (Allen, Michele) |
| Filing 14 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Amerita, Inc..Maya Murilo served on 9/27/2022, answer due 10/18/2022. (Allen, Michele) |
| Filing 13 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Amerita, Inc.: For Christine Nudo waiver sent on 10/13/2022, answer due 12/12/2022. (Allen, Michele) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Brian Michael Gottesman on behalf of Julie Alvino, Diane Labriola, Maya Murilo, Christine Nudo (Gottesman, Brian) |
| Filing 11 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons served on Diane Labriola on 9/28/2022, filed by Amerita, Inc.. (Allen, Michele) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Amerita, Inc..Diane Labriola served on 9/28/2022, answer due 10/19/2022. (Allen, Michele) |
| Filing 9 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons served on Julie Alvino on 9/27/2022, filed by Amerita, Inc.. (Allen, Michele) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Amerita, Inc..Julie Alvino served on 9/27/2022, answer due 10/18/2022. (Allen, Michele) |
| Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Amerita, Inc.: For Deon Defreitas waiver sent on 9/29/2022, answer due 11/28/2022. (Allen, Michele) |
|
SO ORDERED re #3 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Allison Davis, #5 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Bradley W. Howard, #4 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Charlotte E. "Carlye" Dozier, #6 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Brittany K. Hinton filed by Amerita, Inc. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 9/21/2022. (dlw)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Brittany K. Hinton - filed by Amerita, Inc.. (Allen, Michele) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Bradley W. Howard - filed by Amerita, Inc.. (Allen, Michele) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Charlotte E. "Carlye" Dozier - filed by Amerita, Inc.. (Allen, Michele) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Allison Davis - filed by Amerita, Inc.. (Allen, Michele) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Maryellen Noreika. Please include the initials of the Judge (MN) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (mkr) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed against Julie Alvino, Deon Defreitas, Diane Labriola, Maya Murilo and Christine Nudo ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ADEDC-3957350.) - filed by Amerita, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-14, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(mkr) |
| No Summons Issued. (mkr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
