Newman v. British Prime Minister for Queen Elizabeth ll et al
| Shantell D. Newman |
| British Prime Minister for Queen Elizabeth ll and United States of America |
| 1:2022cv01203 |
| September 14, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Richard G Andrews |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1986 Neglect of Duty |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER Granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 9/26/2022. (lah)
|
|
Case Assigned to Judge Richard G. Andrews. Please include the initials of the Judge (RGA) after the case number on all documents filed. Associated Cases: 1:22-cv-01202-RGA, 1:22-cv-01203-RGA (rjb)
|
|
Filing 3
Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (vfm)
|
|
Filing 2
COMPLAINT filed Pro Se with Jury Demand against British Prime Minister for Queen Elizabeth ll, United States of America - filed by Shantel Newman. (Attachments: #1 Acknowledgement of Consent Form, #2 Civil Cover Sheet). (vfm) (Main Document 2 replaced on 9/15/2022) (vfm, ). (Attachment 1 replaced on 9/15/2022) (vfm, ). (Attachment 2 replaced on 9/15/2022) (vfm, ).
|
|
Filing 1
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis - filed by Shantel Newman. (vfm) (Main Document 1 replaced on 9/15/2022) (vfm, ).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
