Zogenix, Inc. et al v. Apotex Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Zogenix, Inc. and Zogenix International Ltd.
Defendant: Apotex Inc., Apotex Corp. and Lupin Limited
Case Number: 1:2022cv01232
Filed: September 21, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Delaware
Presiding Judge: Richard G Andrews
Nature of Suit: Patent - Abbreviated New Drug Application(ANDA)
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 18, 2022 CORRECTING ENTRY: The pdf for D.I. #16 has been replaced with a corrected version. The caption on the filing has been updated to reflect the correct case number. (nms)
November 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 19 SO ORDERED Granting #17 Unopposed Motion to File Under Seal. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 11/14/2022. (nms)
November 14, 2022 Filing 18 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: identifying Corporate Parent Apotex Pharmaceutical Holdings, Inc. for Apotex Inc.; Corporate Parent Aposherm Delaware Holdings Corporation for Apotex Corp. filed by Apotex Corp., Apotex Inc.. (Dorsney, Kenneth)
November 14, 2022 Filing 17 Unopposed Motion to File Under Seal - filed by Apotex Corp., Apotex Inc.. (Dorsney, Kenneth) Modified on 11/14/2022 (nms).
November 14, 2022 Filing 16 [SEALED] DECLARATION of Roshan P. Shrestha, Ph.D re #15 Opening Brief in Support, by Apotex Corp., Apotex Inc.. (Dorsney, Kenneth) Modified on 11/14/2022 (nms). (Main Document 16 replaced on 11/18/2022) (nms).
November 14, 2022 Filing 15 [SEALED] OPENING BRIEF in Support re #14 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to F.R.C.P 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6), filed by Apotex Corp., Apotex Inc..Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 11/28/2022. (Dorsney, Kenneth) Modified on 11/14/2022 (nms).
November 14, 2022 Filing 14 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to F.R.C.P 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) - filed by Apotex Corp., Apotex Inc.. (Dorsney, Kenneth) Modified on 11/14/2022 (nms).
November 14, 2022 Filing 13 STIPULATION and Proposed Order to Extend Time to Answer Complaint - filed by Lupin Limited. (Bilson, David) Modified on 11/14/2022 (nms).
November 14, 2022 Opinion or Order SO ORDERED, re #13 STIPULATION and Proposed Order to Extend Time to Answer Complaint (*Reset Answer Deadlines: Lupin Limited answer due 11/28/2022). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 11/14/2022. (nms)
October 20, 2022 Filing 12 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Lupin to answer, move or otherwise respond to the Complaint (D.I. 1) to November 14, 2022 - filed by Lupin Limited. (Bilson, David)
October 20, 2022 Opinion or Order SO ORDERED, re #12 STIPULATION and Proposed Order to Extend Time (*Reset Answer Deadlines: Lupin Limited answer due 11/14/2022). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 10/20/2022. (nms)
October 3, 2022 Opinion or Order SO ORDERED, re #11 Stipulation and Proposed Order Regarding Time to Respond to Complaint (*Reset Answer Deadlines: Apotex Corp. answer due 11/14/2022; Apotex Inc. answer due 11/14/2022). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 10/3/2022. (nms)
September 30, 2022 Filing 11 STIPULATION and [Proposed] Order Extending Time to Respond to Complaint, by Zogenix International Ltd., Zogenix, Inc.. (Dellinger, Megan) Modified on 9/30/2022 (nms).
September 30, 2022 Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Zogenix, Inc., Zogenix International Ltd..Apotex Inc. served on 9/29/2022, answer due 10/20/2022. (Dellinger, Megan)
September 30, 2022 Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Zogenix, Inc., Zogenix International Ltd..Apotex Corp. served on 9/29/2022, answer due 10/20/2022. (Dellinger, Megan)
September 30, 2022 Filing 8 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons, Complaint and related papers served on Lupin Ltd. on September 29, 2022, filed by Zogenix International Ltd., Zogenix, Inc.. (Dellinger, Megan)
September 29, 2022 Filing 7 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney George F. Pappas, Einar Stole, Thomas J. Sullivan, Tobias Ma, Alexa Hansen, Charles Hall and Jennifer D. Cieluch - filed by Zogenix International Ltd., Zogenix, Inc.. (Dellinger, Megan)
September 29, 2022 Opinion or Order SO ORDERED, re #7 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney George F. Pappas, Einar Stole, Thomas J. Sullivan, Tobias Ma, Alexa Hansen, Charles Hall and Jennifer D. Cieluch, filed by Zogenix International Ltd., Zogenix, Inc.. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 9/29/2022. (nms)
September 28, 2022 Case Assigned to Judge Richard G. Andrews. Please include the initials of the Judge (RGA) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb)
September 21, 2022 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Apotex Corp. on 9/21/2022; Apotex Inc. on 9/21/2022; Lupin Limited on 9/21/2022. (Attachments: #1 Summons Issued, #2 Summons Issued)(mpb)
September 21, 2022 Filing 5 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: identifying Corporate Parent UCB SA for Zogenix International Ltd., Zogenix, Inc. filed by Zogenix International Ltd., Zogenix, Inc.. (mpb)
September 21, 2022 Filing 4 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 11,406,606 B2. (mpb)
September 21, 2022 Filing 3 Supplemental information for patent cases involving an Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) - Date of Expiration of Patent: 08/05/2037. (mpb)
September 21, 2022 Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (mpb)
September 21, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed against Apotex Corp., Apotex Inc., Lupin Limited ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ADEDC-3964591.) - filed by Zogenix, Inc., Zogenix International Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-2, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(mpb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Zogenix, Inc. et al v. Apotex Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Zogenix, Inc.
Represented By: Jack B. Blumenfeld
Represented By: Megan Elizabeth Dellinger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Zogenix International Ltd.
Represented By: Jack B. Blumenfeld
Represented By: Megan Elizabeth Dellinger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Apotex Inc.
Represented By: Kenneth Laurence Dorsney
Represented By: Cortlan S. Hitch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Apotex Corp.
Represented By: Kenneth Laurence Dorsney
Represented By: Cortlan S. Hitch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lupin Limited
Represented By: David A. Bilson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?