Veritaseum Capital, LLC v. Coinbase Global, Inc.
Veritaseum Capital, LLC |
Coinbase Global, Inc. |
1:2022cv01253 |
September 22, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Delaware |
Maryellen Noreika |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, on or before 1/24/2023, Plaintiff shall produce to Defendant (on an outside counsel's eyes only basis), sufficient documentation to demonstrate that Veritaseum Capital has standing to bring this lawsuit. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, within one week after that production of documents, Defendant shall make a further submission to the Court regarding its position on standing. After the Court reviews that submission, it may issue a further order. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika 1/17/2023. (dlw) |
Filing 20 NOTICE of Subsequent Development by Coinbase Global, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Tigan, Jeremy) |
Filing 19 REQUEST for Oral Argument by Veritaseum Capital, LLC re #10 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim . (Miller, Rick) |
Filing 18 STATEMENT re #14 Notice (Other) // Defendant's Request and Response to Plaintiff's Request for Judicial Notice by Coinbase Global, Inc. (Tigan, Jeremy) Modified on 12/5/2022 (dlw). |
Filing 17 REPLY BRIEF re #10 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Coinbase Global, Inc.. (Tigan, Jeremy) |
Filing 16 Letter to Judge Noreika from Rick S. Miller, Esq. regarding Plaintiff's Corrected Request for Judicial Notice - re #15 Notice (Other). (Miller, Rick) |
Filing 15 NOTICE of Corrected Request for Judicial Notice by Veritaseum Capital, LLC re #14 Notice (Other) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6)(Miller, Rick) |
Filing 14 NOTICE of Request to Take Judicial Notice by Veritaseum Capital, LLC re #13 Answering Brief in Opposition (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5)(Miller, Rick) |
Filing 13 ANSWERING BRIEF in Opposition re #10 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Veritaseum Capital, LLC.Reply Brief due date per Local Rules is 12/5/2022. (Miller, Rick) |
Filing 12 DECLARATION of Eric Huang re #10 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Coinbase Global, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits 1-11)(Tigan, Jeremy) Modified on 11/14/2022 (dlw). |
Filing 11 OPENING BRIEF in Support re #10 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Coinbase Global, Inc..Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 11/28/2022. (Tigan, Jeremy) |
Filing 10 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim - filed by Coinbase Global, Inc.. (Tigan, Jeremy) |
Pro Hac Vice Attorney David M. Grable, Olga Musayev, John T. McKee, Thomas D. Pease, and Eric H. Huang for Coinbase Global, Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (mkr) |
Filing 9 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Eric H. Huang, Thomas D. Pease, John T. McKee, Olga Musayev and David M. Grable - filed by Coinbase Global, Inc.. (Blumenfeld, Jack) |
SO ORDERED re #9 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Eric H. Huang, Thomas D. Pease, John T. McKee, Olga Musayev and David M. Grable filed by Coinbase Global, Inc. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 11/1/2022. (dlw) |
Pro Hac Vice Attorney Brundidge I. Carl and Moore E. David for Veritaseum Capital, LLC added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (mkr) |
SO ORDERED re #8 Emergency MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint (Set/Reset Answer Deadlines: Coinbase Global, Inc. answer due 11/14/2022). ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 10/12/2022. (dlw) |
Filing 8 Emergency MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, - filed by Coinbase Global, Inc.. (Blumenfeld, Jack) |
Filing 7 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Veritaseum Capital, LLC. (Miller, Rick) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney David E. Moore, Esquire - filed by Veritaseum Capital, LLC. (Miller, Rick) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Carl I. Brundidge, Esquire - filed by Veritaseum Capital, LLC. (Miller, Rick) |
SO ORDERED re #6 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney David E. Moore, Esquire, #5 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Carl I. Brundidge, Esquire filed by Veritaseum Capital, LLC. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 10/6/2022. (dlw) |
Case Assigned to Judge Maryellen Noreika. Please include the initials of the Judge (MN) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Veritaseum Capital, LLC. All Defendants. (Miller, Rick) |
Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) US 11,196,566 B2. (lam) |
Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (lam) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT For Patent Infringement with Jury Demand against Coinbase Global, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ADEDC-3965250.) - filed by Veritaseum Capital, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(lam) |
No Summons Issued. (lam) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.